Climate measures include things like temperature and precipitation to name a few.
Incorrect. Climates don't have any measures. They are entirely subjective human characterizations of local conditions, bounded by a time frame and a local area. Your assertion that there are somehow "measures" and other data is absurd. You apparently never went to school, or if you did, your stupid
Climate religion brainwashed all your knowledge out of you. How can you think that there is any data associated with a climate?
Let's look at a hypothetical conversation involving us and a 3rd-grader:
IBDaMann (to 3rd-grader): What is the summer climate of Phoenix, Arizona?
3rd-grader: It's really hot ... and dry!
IBDaMann (to 3rd-grader): What data did you use to calculate that climate?
3rd-grader: I, I don't know what that is, but I've been to Phoenix in the summer and it's really hot.
IBDaMann (to 3rd-grader): No worries, that's the correct answer. It's just your characterization. Good job.
IBDaMann (to ZenMode): What climate are you claiming has associated data? Even our 3rd-grader knows that there is no data associated with any climate.
ZenMode (to IBDaMann): Well, climates have measures like temperature and precipitation to name a few.
IBDaMann (to ZenMode): That's weather. Are you telling me that all this time you simply never learned the difference between climate and weather? Weather has world-'o-data and climate has no data. Listen to the 3rd-grader, i,e. Phoenix is really hot and dry. There's no data.
ZenMode (to IBDaMann): but, but, climate is weather averages over a long time.
IBDaMann (to ZenMode): Nope. Listen to the 3rd-grader and learn something. Besides, there is no such thing as averaged weather, but regardless, climate has no data.
Now, let's acknowledge why there is much willful ignorance and obvious attempts to avoid answering a very simple question about the impact of a loss of atmosphere.
I completely answered your question. Now, let's acknowledge why there is much willful ignorance and obvious attempts to avoid answering a very simple question about which climate you are claiming has changed during your lifetime.
Into the Night made the completely correct point that climate does not change. You, not having any idea what you are talking about, tried to be snarky in retort, and asked "Climate doesn't change?" The answer to your question is "No, climate doesn't change." I then asked you which climate you claim has changed. If you acknowledge that there haven't been any climates that have changed, then you have your answer, i.e. no, climate does not change. If you acknowledge that climate can only change under circumstances that will never happen, then you have your answer, i.e. no, climate will never change.
To the best of your knowledge, you are not aware of any climate that has changed. We are done on this topic. If you would like to reengage, answer my question.
If you acknowledge a loss of atmosphere, ... would result in the average temp of the Earth going from 60 degrees Fahrenheit to 0 degrees Fahrenheit,
Did it hurt when you pulled this out of your azz? It has nothing to do with reality.
then you also would acknowledge that the atmosphere, and therefore its composition, matter.
I do not. The atmospheric composition does not matter. Only the amount of thermal energy received by the surface, which is a function entirely of solar output, earth's proximity & earth's emissivity ... and nobody knows earth's emissivity. You have been lied to by scientifically illiterate warmizombies that you gullibly trust when they tell you that they are thienth geniutheth. Go learn some physics.
People who make an attempt to educate themselves also know that Venus, despite being further from the the Sun than Earth, has an average temperature that is about 14x higher than earth - around 850 degrees Fahrenheit.
You are babbling at this point. First, Venus is not further from the sun than earth; people who make an attempt to educate themselves know that Venus is about 40 million kilometers closer to the sun than the earth is. Second, nobody knows Venus' average temperature. What is reasonably estimated are surface temperatures, which like earth, vary from day to night (not much in this case) and per elevation. The basis for the estimates are Venus' relatively close proximity to the sun and its uber-thick, high-pressure atmosphere. Read up on the Ideal Gas law.
Why, do you ask? Because Venus' atmosphere is much, much different than the Earth's. It's about 95% CO2.
You were good up to the Venusian atmospheric content which blew it for you. Venus' CO2 is not a factor in temperature. It's the atmosphere's thickness that matters. The Venusian surface has an atmospheric pressure of 1,330 psi vs. earth's 14.7 psi at sea level. Your homework: read up on the
Ideal Gas law. Also, read up on the 1st law of thermodynamics (law of conservation of energy) which explains why no substance can simply create energy out of nothing.
I would like to take the opportunity to reiterate that you are a scientifically illiterate boob who does not do himself any favors by simply regurgitating the stupid utterances of other scientifically illiterate warmizombies. Grow yourself a pair and call boooolsch't when you are being told what to believe. You know it's going to be wrong.
CO2 molecules trap more heat than other atmospheric molecules.
Listen to yourself. You are presumably a grown adult who not only doesn't know what science is, you don't even know what heat is. You should be embarrassed. Hint: heat is not something that can be sealed, contained, held, secured, locked, incarcerated, boxed, or trapped in any way. Your homework: learn what heat is.
No, the first and second laws of thermodynamics don't matter.
Thermodynamics matters and applies always and everywhere. You are clearly a science denier.
Nope, you are preaching
thettled thienth, which is your religious dogma. You don't have any science.
