You are the one making the affirmative claim, i.e. the declaration of what I somehow don't know. You bear the full burden to support that claim unless you wish to acknowledge that it is merely your irrational and baseless belief.
Well, the first thing one would want to do is ensure one can read. In your illiteracy, you fail to comprehend the word "target" and thus are completely lost in the discussion.
Great, then all he needs to do to support his claim is quote my exact words in context and show how they demonstrate a lack of understanding. Easy-Peezy-Lemon-Squeasy. He sounds like he is just one step away ... except that he just revealed that his confusion, or his "observation" as you put it, is based on his lack of reading comprehension, so he might have to search further for some other "observation."
I see your declarations and your insistence. Were you planning on being specific? You look exactly like a pretender who doesn't know anything about statistical math himself. I'm afraid that will have to be my assumption until you offer something more concrete.
Heh, your cowardice-induced vagueness and your inability to apply commas is hilarious.
My signature is still there, undismantled.
You are a pretender! You are scientifically illiterate and mathematically incompetent while pretending to be a conthumate geniuth in both areas. Hmmmm. We will never see anything specific from you, will we? Hmmmm.
Your posts don't make any sense, yet you imagine that you are being funny. I pity you.
