Will Harris chicken out?

gfm7175 said:
Right. Those are the pertinent questions.

As to the debates, Demonkkkrats are pussies and will refuse to debate under any terms/conditions that are even the slightest bit unfavorable to them (e.g. in front of a live audience of "general public" people, aka an audience that isn't chock full of Demonkkkrat donors), let alone debate with a moderator who isn't favorable to them (e.g. Tucker Carlson). FOX News is still favorable for Demonkkkrats and they won't even agree to a FOX News debate. They refuse to step outside of the kiddie splash pool while they project their own cowardice onto Trump's campaign.

As for preventing the stealing of the upcoming (s)election, that one will be more difficult to address since there's so many different facets to it.
Click to expand...
Kamala Harris is willing to debate Trump with ABC moderating...without an audience.

Makes sense...and shows that you are full of shit.
 
Ross Dolan said:
Kamala Harris is willing to debate Trump with ABC moderating...without an audience.

Makes sense...and shows that you are full of shit.
Click to expand...
If Kamala isn't a coward, then why does she ALWAYS need a special moderator without an audience?

If Demonkkkrats ACTUALLY believed in "equity", then wouldn't they agree to two debates, one in which THEIR SIDE gets to determine the rules and another in which THEIR OPPONENT'S SIDE gets to determine the rules?

E.g. -- One debate on ABC with [insert libtard moderator here] with no audience, and another debate on X (Twitter) with Tucker Carlson as moderator with a live audience.

It's only "equitable", right? "DEI", right?
 
gfm7175 said:
If Kamala isn't a coward, then why does she ALWAYS need a special moderator without an audience?
Click to expand...

Who says she does? She may want it...without it being a necessity. And since she is working with a simpleton like Trump...she should stick to her guns.

gfm7175 said:
If Demonkkkrats ACTUALLY believed in "equity", then wouldn't they agree to two debates, one in which THEIR SIDE gets to determine the rules and another in which THEIR OPPONENT'S SIDE gets to determine the rules?
Click to expand...

Trump was the one who issued a challenge...anywhere at anytime...and Joe Biden accepted it. The places and conditions for the debate were agreed by both parties.

Now, Joe Biden is gone and Kamala Harris has taken his place at the top of the ticket.

She is willing to accept the original deal...or if Trump is afraid of her...to go it alone.

No problem.

Why should she be required to accept Trump's conditions?
gfm7175 said:
E.g. -- One debate on ABC with [insert libtard moderator here] with no audience, and another debate on X (Twitter) with Tucker Carlson as moderator with a live audience.

It's only "equitable", right? "DEI", right?
Click to expand...
No...not at all.

If Trump is afraid to meet her under the original conditions...they could start the negotiations from scratch or simply scrap the idea of a debate at all.

If I were advising Kamala...I would say: Demand no audience. (His supporters are nuts and disruptive)...and certainly not at FOX. If he wants to agree to MSNBC (he's be nuts to do so)...fine. If not...CBS or PBS.

Anything else I can help you with?
 
Ross Dolan said:
Who says she does? She may want it...without it being a necessity. And since she is working with a simpleton like Trump...she should stick to her guns.



Trump was the one who issued a challenge...anywhere at anytime...and Joe Biden accepted it. The places and conditions for the debate were agreed by both parties.

Now, Joe Biden is gone and Kamala Harris has taken his place at the top of the ticket.

She is willing to accept the original deal...or if Trump is afraid of her...to go it alone.

No problem.

Why should she be required to accept Trump's conditions?

No...not at all.

If Trump is afraid to meet her under the original conditions...they could start the negotiations from scratch or simply scrap the idea of a debate at all.

If I were advising Kamala...I would say: Demand no audience. (His supporters are nuts and disruptive)...and certainly not at FOX. If he wants to agree to MSNBC (he's be nuts to do so)...fine. If not...CBS or PBS.

Anything else I can help you with?
Click to expand...
Translation: Ross Dolan (aka Frank Apisa) doesn't practice what he preaches.

What's new?
 
gfm7175 said:
Translation: Ross Dolan (aka Frank Apisa) doesn't practice what he preaches.

What's new?
Click to expand...
I practice what I preach...and I try not to preach too much.

You seem to be running out of things to say, gfm. Now you are getting triter and triter.

But...you always have been trite...so we (those of us listening to your harangues) are use to it.

Harangue on, Son.
 
Ross Dolan said:
I practice what I preach
Click to expand...
Blatant lie.
Ross Dolan said:
...and I try not to preach too much.
Click to expand...
Blatant lie.
Ross Dolan said:
You seem to be running out of things to say, gfm.
Click to expand...
Projection.
Ross Dolan said:
Now you are getting triter and triter.
Click to expand...
Projection.
Ross Dolan said:
But...you always have been trite...
Click to expand...
Projection.
Ross Dolan said:
so we (those of us listening to your harangues) are use to it.
Click to expand...
You are a single person, not a plural.
Ross Dolan said:
Harangue on, Son.
Click to expand...
Projection.
 
gfm7175 said:
Blatant lie.

Blatant lie.

Projection.

Projection.

Projection.

You are a single person, not a plural.

Projection.
Click to expand...
Wow...this is working much better than I supposed it would.

You are in a frenzy...and it shows.

Try to get a grip. I wanted you to make mistakes...not look like a lunatic.

C'mon. Try to get back on track.

You can do it.

Just keep repeating, "I know I can, I know I can, I know I can, I know I can."

Do it for me, Bud. If you go completely ape shit, you will make me look like a villain.
 
Ross Dolan said:
Wow...this is working much better than I supposed it would.

You are in a frenzy...and it shows.

Try to get a grip. I wanted you to make mistakes...not look like a lunatic.

C'mon. Try to get back on track.

You can do it.

Just keep repeating, "I know I can, I know I can, I know I can, I know I can."

Do it for me, Bud. If you go completely ape shit, you will make me look like a villain.
Click to expand...
Projection.
 
Ross Dolan said:
Kamala Harris is willing to debate Trump with ABC moderating...without an audience.
Click to expand...
Big deal. Kamala's team has to negotiate the details. ABC is out. How about we have the NRA moderate the debate? ... or will Kamala chicken-out of even that?
 
Ross Dolan said:
If you have to ask that question...you would not understand the answer, Matt.

If Kamala had said, "I will not debate you on FOX...but how about we do it on MSNBC...how would you suggest Trump respond?
Click to expand...
I would have him say yes, then call her a scared coward that she says no to Fox.
 
RB 60 said:
I would have him say yes, then call her a scared coward that she says no to Fox.
Click to expand...
I would love to see him saying the "YES" part.

He is the coward.

As I said earlier, she (any Democrat) should say NO to MSNBC...and he (any Republican) should say NO to FOX.

If you cannot see the sense in that...you are debating the wrong kinds of issues.
 
I haven't seenn her agreeing to a debate yet... And no interviews... Won't answer any questions... Just the same canned speech... What is she
afraid of ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top