12B

[Dutch Uncle]

Set out 12B troll bait, trying to get somebody banned.

Examples please or are you just delusional again?

I'll fully understand if you can't do it.

 

[Matt Dillon]

Examples please or are you just delusional again?

I'll fully understand if you can't do it.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...at-you-do-actually-quot&p=5077502#post5077502

 

[anonymoose]

Remember Trinnity's website?

Of course, I've heard she's turned state's evidence. Life goes on.

Never heard of it and have no idea who ‘she’ is.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...at-you-do-actually-quot&p=5077502#post5077502

How is that bait, Matt? Just because you say it is? Like Earl implying Nordberg is a pedo, just because you claim it doesn't make it true.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Never heard of it and have no idea who ‘she’ is.

Ask Earl. He's a big participant over there.

 

[MAGA MAN]

I'm sure there have been multiple threads on this topic (that I haven't paid attention to) so my apologies if I'm just rehashing an old discussion here. What is the psychology behind so many people getting banned for violating this rule on a board that has so few rules? Is it simply human nature that even on an anonymous message board people want to push the limits of any boundaries and 12B is that vehicle for JPP?

People who can't debate get desperate to find the worst insult possible.

 

[Matt Dillon]

How is that bait, Matt? Just because you say it is? Like Earl implying Nordberg is a pedo, just because you claim it doesn't make it true.

Like you don't know.

You're a lying shitbag full of malice. Just an ugly soul.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Like you don't know.

You're a lying shitbag full of malice. Just an ugly soul.

You're free to lie about me all day long, Matt. You're well known to be "off".

The fact you can't prove your lies about me is interesting.

 

[Stringfellow Hawk]

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...at-you-do-actually-quot&p=5077502#post5077502

yes, and he gets away with it all the time, calling some one a label with that derogatory term in front of it gets him a pass when it is no different

 

[Matt Dillon]

yes, and he gets away with it all the time, calling some one a label with that derogatory term in front of it gets him a pass when it is no different

Don't step into his trap.

 

[Stringfellow Hawk]

Don't step into his trap.

he admitted to me yesterday he was a chickenshit, not wasting anymore time with him

 

[Concart]

I'm sure there have been multiple threads on this topic (that I haven't paid attention to) so my apologies if I'm just rehashing an old discussion here. What is the psychology behind so many people getting banned for violating this rule on a board that has so few rules? Is it simply human nature that even on an anonymous message board people want to push the limits of any boundaries and 12B is that vehicle for JPP?

It's pretty simple. People get frustrated because the rule makes no sense. For example, I can, say, start a poll and ask why all Trump supporters are pedophiles. And I can make up all kinds of shit to prove that all Trump supporters are pedophiles. But I can't name anyone that posts here, even though the majority are Trump supporters. On the other hand, I cannot speculate as to WHY there are so many threads about pedophilia created by certain members. That will get you a 12b. Calling everyone in a given group a pedophile is just fine though.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

It's pretty simple. People get frustrated because the rule makes no sense. For example, I can, say, start a poll and ask why all Trump supporters are pedophiles. And I can make up all kinds of shit to prove that all Trump supporters are pedophiles. But I can't name anyone that posts here, even though the majority are Trump supporters. On the other hand, I cannot speculate as to WHY there are so many threads about pedophilia created by certain members. That will get you a 12b. Calling everyone in a given group a pedophile is just fine though.

I see it as more of a "You have to draw the line somewhere" problem. Where do you think the line should be drawn? More authoritarian as some have proposed or more anarchy as others have suggested?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

he admitted to me yesterday he was a chickenshit, not wasting anymore time with him

yes, and he gets away with it all the time, calling some one a label with that derogatory term in front of it gets him a pass when it is no different

 

[Concart]

I see it as more of a "You have to draw the line somewhere" problem. Where do you think the line should be drawn? More authoritarian as some have proposed or more anarchy as others have suggested?

I'd restate the rule. 'Don't accuse a poster of pedophilia. Everything else is fair game'.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

I'd restate the rule. 'Don't accuse a poster of pedophilia. Everything else is fair game'.

So Guille's statement about Nordberg is okay?

...Is Nordberg a pedo? No, at least I don't think so. ...

Implying is okay? "Gee, that new guy sure likes'em young!" or "Rumors say he has a fondness for puppies, candy and new dolls."

 

[anonymoose]

Ask Earl. He's a big participant over there.

Tried to check it out but saw nothing. Now I'm curious.

 

[christiefan915]

They should stop being pro-groomer, then. But, that's never gonna happen...

You really are an idiot if you think grooming is a political issue. Who's doing the grooming for all repug pedos? Repugs are.

 

[christiefan915]

Only one political party is fighting the ban on formalized child grooming in public schools.

There is no "formalized child grooming" in public schools or any schools. As usual, you're fear-mongering and pandering to the LCD with this lie.

 

[christiefan915]

Partly; suggesting that a poster has been a victim of pedophile abuse while a child is also off-limits.

You mean like a certain poster suggesting that as a child, I was on my knees in front of a priest? Funny that poster never went to banned camp. Two sets of rules for sure.