That is not an implication. That is an assumption that you pulled out of your ass and now won't let go of because you're beginning to realize how stupid you sound.
I'll try one last time with you. The claim was that American civilians need guns to protect themselves from the federal government. That claim is absurd and held by abject idiots such as yourself because guns cannot protect against the mightiest and largest 21st century military on the planet.
I do not want the military used against Americans, you lying pile of delusional shit. My point was and remains simply that "a well-regulated militia" doesn't have shit to do with defending against a federal government that could obliterate the citizenry if it so chose.