Into the Night
Verified User
Gun fights kill way more than fist fights.
So? It is unconstitutional to ban guns or any other weapon.
Gun fights kill way more than fist fights.
And that perfectly exposes one of the problems with guns, think of all the fist fights you have had in your life and consider how many of them were over something worthy of taking another’s life. The problem with guns is the easy access, the guy gets pissed at the wife and reaches for the weapon, has a beef at work, shoots up the place, without the gun handy, most would never occur
Now there’s a simplistic view, marches are capable of killing face to face large numbers of people in seconds, guns are, and luckily for me, I never knew or know anyone who gave a kid a gun at age 12, then again, I live, and have largely lived, in an area where guns are restricted and gun violence less
So? It is unconstitutional to ban guns or any other weapon.
luckily i've been in very few fist fights. I hate fighting, personally, and try to avoid it at all costs.......since I carry a gun, nobody tries to start a fight with me. it's a pretty good deterrent
Where did I say otherwise!?
Discard of the Constitution of the United States. The right of self defense is inherent. No God needed.
I had a .22 and .410 at the age of 12.........but at that age I was also of the mindset that hunting animals was cool
Right, so is life, and not being shot visiting a mall, theater, church, club, senior citizen home, bowling alley, school, club, massage parlor, etc
Once a person pays his debt to society, all of his/her rights are restored as per the Constitution.
Post #53, #55.
Consider yourself lucky. I usually don't bother to go look up where you are denying your own argument. I leave that to anyone else who wants to.
It certainly can be. It's also a useful skill to develop.
Learning to handle a gun, and to aim and reliably hit your target, even though the target is moving, is pretty cool.
Why do you think people make a big hobby out of skeet shooting?
Not a rule. Contextomy fallacy. Pay attention, dumbass.If they violated the parents' rule, they shouldn't ever possess a match ever again?
It's not a problem now.Correct. It was never a problem until a few decades ago.
They should be, but they aren't.
as kids, no. it was nothing but bullies wanting to beat down on smaller kids to make them feel better about themselves.........as an adult, you never know. anyone who wants to puff and posture about how they are going to beat my ass obviously has no self control and could end up beating me to death. There have been several deaths attributed to a single punch as well.......so, i'm not taking that chance.
false
false. while carrying a gun everyone is respectful and courteous. In rittenhouses case, he encountered a bunch of bullies who thought they could intimidate a young kid and when he didn't respond with gunshots, thought that they could attack him. they were wrong. that's how it goes with mob violence though........everyone seems braver around others with the same intent
Right, so is life, and not being shot visiting a mall, theater, church, club, senior citizen home, bowling alley, school, club, massage parlor, etc
Once a person pays his debt to society, all of his/her rights are restored as per the Constitution.
You cannot prevent all murders.
If someone takes a shot at you, shoot back!
no they are not.
sure, confiscate every single gun and gun violence would cease to exist.....but VIOLENCE would still exist, right?It is true, even common sense tells you, without the gun easily available less gun violence occurs
Doubt the “respectful and courteous,” and Rittenhouse didn’t scare anyone, mistakenly he thought showing up with a assault weapon would scare off people, he was wrong, in fact, opposite occurred