Dump stacking the courts w/racist white men for a lifetime.

Obamas choices were highly rated by the ABA. He tried to install highly qualified people. Yet the Repubs blocked many ,because they could.
 
Nerdberg said:
Relax . When Dems are charged they quit. when repubs are, they continue on. Farenhold and Trump ring a bell? How long did Vitter stay in office after his sexual peccadillos became knopwn? POnly about a decade. But he was a Repub. The rules do not apply.
Click to expand...

So you're saying that anyone who is accused of anything should quit, Nerdberg?

Bill Clinton, for example? Did he quit?
 
evince said:
If they have been seated we have to accept them
Click to expand...

I'm saying we should not seat them if they are corrupt before they take the seat.

Most of the men he gave a seat to are bigots, racist, homophobs, before they took their lifetime position.
We shouldn't spend money trying to unseat them, we should instead prevent them from being seated.

Why do we always have to give racist, homophobic, bigots the benefit of the doubt?
 
Nordberg said:
Relax . When Dems are charged they quit. when repubs are, they continue on. Farenhold and Trump ring a bell? How long did Vitter stay in office after his sexual peccadillos became knopwn? POnly about a decade. But he was a Repub. The rules do not apply.
Click to expand...

Nobody was charged, only accused.

Current Members of Congress:

Accused and resigned: 1 Dem (Franken), 1 Rep (Franks);
Accused and retired: 1 Dem (Conyers);
Accused and not running for reelection: 1 Rep (Farenthold): 1 Dem (Kihuen)
Accused and staying in office: 1 Dem (Scott)
 
Flash said:
Nobody was charged, only accused.

Current Members of Congress:

Accused and resigned: 1 Dem (Franken), 1 Rep (Franks);
Accused and retired: 1 Dem (Conyers);
Accused and not running for reelection: 1 Rep (Farenthold): 1 Dem (Kihuen)
Accused and staying in office: 1 Dem (Scott)
Click to expand...



Franken hasn't actually left the Senate, has he?

I don't recall Billy Blowjob Clinton resigning, either.

Clearly, Nerdberg's "rules" only apply selectively.
 
Nerdberg said:
Obamas choices were highly rated by the ABA. He tried to install highly qualified people. Yet the Repubs blocked many ,because they could.
Click to expand...

Looks like DEMOCRATS didn't try very hard.

According to the ABA Journal: “When the White House participates in the pre-nomination process, the president can choose not to officially nominate that candidate before a ‘not qualified’ rating can go public. President Bill Clinton chose to advance four nominees who received such a rating, three of whom were confirmed by the Senate.”

The ABA Journal also noted a New York Times report in 2011, which found that “the ABA gave a ‘not qualified’ rating to 14 of about 185 potential candidates the Obama administration asked the ABA to evaluate.”

Barack Obama did not nominate any of candidates who received a “not qualified” rating from the ABA, but it is incorrect to state the same about Bill Clinton.


http://www.weeklystandard.com/fact-check-were-any-clinton-or-obama-judicial-nominees-deemed-not-qualified-by-the-aba/article/2010460#!

What are the odds that Nerdberg criticized Blowjob Billy's nominees?
 
IQ of 64 said:
I'm saying we should not seat them if they are corrupt before they take the seat. Most of the men he gave a seat to are bigots, racist, homophobs, before they took their lifetime position. We shouldn't spend money trying to unseat them, we should instead prevent them from being seated. Why do we always have to give racist, homophobic, bigots the benefit of the doubt?
Click to expand...

How are any of these people "racist, homophobic, bigots"?

I'll understand if you can't explain.

I'll even understand if you can't name them without Googling.
 
God bless America said:
Franken hasn't actually left the Senate, has he?

I don't recall Billy Blowjob Clinton resigning, either.

Clearly, Nerdberg's "rules" only apply selectively.
Click to expand...

I don't think there is any legitimacy in trying to make sexual misconduct a partisan issue. Both Democrats and Republicans have many examples. Partisans always try to pretend members of one party are more moral, caring, knowledgeable, etc. than the other based on nothing but their opinion.
 
Flash said:
I don't think there is any legitimacy in trying to make sexual misconduct a partisan issue. Both Democrats and Republicans have many examples. Partisans always try to pretend members of one party are more moral, caring, knowledgeable, etc. than the other based on nothing but their opinion.
Click to expand...

I laugh when liberals pretend to care about sexual morality anyway, Flash.

Don't you?
 
TTQ64 said:
I'm saying we should not seat them if they are corrupt before they take the seat.

Most of the men he gave a seat to are bigots, racist, homophobs, before they took their lifetime position.
We shouldn't spend money trying to unseat them, we should instead prevent them from being seated.

Why do we always have to give racist, homophobic, bigots the benefit of the doubt?
Click to expand...

Who was a racist seated as a federal judge?
 
How stupid. they are the arbiters in a trial. they hear cases, You think a guy who has never heard a case or presented one is qualified to be a judge.? Do you really? Sad, truth and facts have a left wing slant.
 
Nerdberg said:
How stupid. they are the arbiters in a trial. they hear cases, You think a guy who has never heard a case or presented one is qualified to be a judge.? Do you really? Sad, truth and facts have a left wing slant.
Click to expand...

We won't know until they hear some, will we, Nerdberg?

Did you cry about Blowjob Bill Clinton's unrated court picks?
 
Wrong god dumbo. That isn't difficult to figure out. Ever read the bible or talk to Christians? Ever talk to a Scientologist? How about a Muslim? If you do not believe in their god, you are wrong a face eternal damnation. However, an all knowing god, would know you are not really a believer, but pretending to escape the terrible afterlife.
 
Nerdberg said:
Wrong god dumbo. That isn't difficult to figure out. Ever read the bible or talk to Christians? Ever talk to a Scientologist? How about a Muslim? If you do not believe in their god, you are wrong a face eternal damnation. However, an all knowing god, would know you are not really a believer, but pretending to escape the terrible afterlife.
Click to expand...

You seem confused, Nerdberg. Are you on medication?
 
I CRY REALLY HARD said:
I'm saying we should not seat them if they are corrupt before they take the seat.

Most of the LIBERALS are bigots, racist, homophobs, before they took their lifetime position.
We shouldn't spend money trying to unseat them, we should instead prevent them from being seated.

Why do we always have to give LIBERAL racist, homophobic, bigots the benefit of the doubt?
Click to expand...

Obama - 2010 - “Elections have consequences.” It’s the political way for winners to tell losers: “Tough luck, you lost. Get over it.”

:dealwithit:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top