SmarterthanYou
rebel
because the liberals and biased media didn't try framing him for 2nd degree murder.Why is no one commenting on the other guy at the accident scene?
because the liberals and biased media didn't try framing him for 2nd degree murder.Why is no one commenting on the other guy at the accident scene?
Why is no one commenting on the other guy at the accident scene?
""Zimmerman and another man helped four people get out of an SUV that had overturned Wednesday evening in Sanford — the same community where the former neighborhood watch volunteer fatally shot unarmed teenager Trayvon Martin in 2012 — Seminole County Sheriff’s Office spokeswoman Heather Smith said."
http://wtvr.com/2013/07/22/zimmerman-saves-family/
I've been wondering that myself.
Re not hating teachers - good point, Z-fan, as far as I know you don't hate teachers.
Why is no one commenting on the other guy at the accident scene?
""Zimmerman and another man helped four people get out of an SUV that had overturned Wednesday evening in Sanford — the same community where the former neighborhood watch volunteer fatally shot unarmed teenager Trayvon Martin in 2012 — Seminole County Sheriff’s Office spokeswoman Heather Smith said."
http://wtvr.com/2013/07/22/zimmerman-saves-family/
I've been wondering that myself.
Re not hating teachers - good point, Z-fan, as far as I know you don't hate teachers.
Chuck Norris thinks "another man" is da' man.......
because the liberals and biased media didn't try framing him for 2nd degree murder.
i also don't "hate blacks"
I just hate people that violently attack law abiding citizens.
personally, I don't enjoy a message board with a lot of nasty stuff flying back and forth. That you, as a staffer, finds it awesome explains a lot about the atmosphere of this board.
If all you want is nastiness, let me know and I'll leave. And the five of you left can fling mud as you like.
If you want a functional board, you might want to rethink your attitude. And yes, I do have higher standards for the staff members than I do for individual members. Especially since we can't put you on ignore.
Wrong. Because the conservatives wouldn't give this story a second glance if it didn't give them another chance to gloat about GZ.
I find your accounts of celebrating Z's acquittal appalling. He killed Martin. He wasn't found guilty of murder. But he killed a teenage boy.
I understand that those who supported Z would feel relief that he got off. But your celebrating and drinking champagne and changing your avatar was tasteless and appalling, in my opinion.
So I thanked the post.
No....you love guns....nothing wrong with that...I like 'em too....but you love anything that you think supports your agenda.
You couldn't care less about GZ or TM....what you care about is the verdict...because it sets a precedent.
stop telling me what I care about. I care immensely about GZ. Yes I care about guns but I care about the innocent man george zimmerman just as much.
you should see the email I wrote the zimmermans last week. It's very long and heartfelt. I don't think I will share it here though. I have been stressed out about this case for a year and half. I have followed every piece of it. I have sympathized and worried with zimmerman along the way. Him being found not guilty was a huge cathartic release for me.
People here just don't get me, I guess. I can say it in black and white, but it just doesn't compute for people. I am on TEAM ZIMMERMAN, motherfuckers! I can't say it anymore clearly than that. I believe in zimmerman, I worry for zimmerman, and I hope for zimmerman. I support zimmerman 110%.
and there is no additional precedent made by this case. It wasn't anything groundbreaking in relation to the law. this was classic common law self defense that already has hundreds of years of precedent preceding it.
No additional precedent? I beg to differ. The precedent is that a neighborhood watch personnel is allowed to go beyond the observation and reporting of suspicious activity and go looking for trouble while armed. They aren't cops on a beat. They are civilians.
Man Crush....got it. Sorry. You're right, I don't get it. I'm not saying that TM was a saint, I'm not saying that he didn't attack Zimmerman. I've only been saying all along that one man's story with no witnesses is subject to dispute.
And I know, following someone isn't illegal, but you are in serious denial if you don't think it was the initiating factor in this whole mess.
Since you're trying so hard to be impartial, could you please go out of your way and provide any presented evidence that Zimmerman was looking for trouble.
Thanks