Hero Cop Will Not Be Charged

martin said:
She was in the lead, pounding at the final obstruction between the mob and the Congress other than a handful of guards including the officer who did what he reasonably thought needed to be done. What person in her right mind wouldn't think she was risking her life in that circumstance.
Click to expand...

Agreed.
 
Well, I guess this is just all bullshit then...

maxresdefault.jpg
 
Walt said:
But you do not accept any of the "fake news"? Just news that agrees with your perspective. So you get a President-Elect investigating a homicide? That just does not seem possible to me.



Now you are backing down and saying he is aware of it from reading the news. How is that unethical?
Click to expand...

Depends on the quality of the news. How did you get he would be investigating the homicide from what I posted?

He gets briefings, too. How would it be unethical for him to be informed of basic matters?
 
Primavera said:
He totally over reacted, shooting at an unarmed 100lb woman shows that.
Click to expand...

Dude. He shot a trespasser. A criminal They were attacking us. Don't you care? The cops could have shot everyone - I'm glad they didn't - but they'd been within their rights to do so.

Get off your partisan hobby horse. She committed a crime. I'm sorry she's dead, but it wasn't the cop's fault. It was hers.
 
LurchAddams said:
Dude. He shot a trespasser. A criminal They were attacking us. Don't you care? The cops could have shot everyone - I'm glad they didn't - but they'd been within their rights to do so.

Get off your partisan hobby horse. She committed a crime. I'm sorry she's dead, but it wasn't the cop's fault. It was hers.
Click to expand...

Why did no other cops feel threatened enough to fire? I've said many times they were idiots, but hey, they were just following Cory Booker's suggestion...

“Please don’t just come here today and then go home,” Booker told attendees of the National Conference on Ending Homelessness. “Go to the Hill today. Get up and, please, get up in the face of some congresspeople.”

https://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-cory-booker-urges-activists-get-face-members-ryan-saavedra
 
RB 60 said:
Why did no other cops feel threatened enough to fire? I've said many times they were idiots, but hey, they were just following Cory Booker's suggestion...

“Please don’t just come here today and then go home,” Booker told attendees of the National Conference on Ending Homelessness. “Go to the Hill today. Get up and, please, get up in the face of some congresspeople.”

https://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-cory-booker-urges-activists-get-face-members-ryan-saavedra
Click to expand...

Dude. You commit a crime, like trespassing - you take the risk. You're always all over liberals for not being responsible, hold that woman responsible for her own actions.

Or don't. I really don't care.
 
LurchAddams said:
Dude. You commit a crime, like trespassing - you take the risk. You're always all over liberals for not being responsible, hold that woman responsible for her own actions.

Or don't. I really don't care.
Click to expand...

That doesn't answer my question. Why didn't any other cop feel threatened enough to fire too? And what about Booker's statement? Did they act on his suggestion? Whachasay?
 
RB 60 said:
That doesn't answer my question. Why didn't any other cop feel threatened enough to fire too? And what about Booker's statement? Did they act on his suggestion? Whachasay?
Click to expand...

I don't know why any other cop didn't shoot anyone. They were within their rights to. Other's actions or inactions don't mean what the cop who shot Babbit was wrong, dude.

He was within his rights. She was committing a crime. It was a tragedy, like an accident, but the only guilty person is Babbit.
 
LurchAddams said:
I don't know why any other cop didn't shoot anyone. They were within their rights to. Other's actions or inactions don't mean what the cop who shot Babbit was wrong, dude.

He was within his rights. She was committing a crime. It was a tragedy, like an accident, but the only guilty person is Babbit.
Click to expand...

Well, you did answer one of my questions, so I'll give you a 50%. Good thing it wasn't a curriculum test, huh?
 
LurchAddams said:
Dude. He shot a trespasser. A criminal They were attacking us. Don't you care? The cops could have shot everyone - I'm glad they didn't - but they'd been within their rights to do so.

Get off your partisan hobby horse. She committed a crime. I'm sorry she's dead, but it wasn't the cop's fault. It was hers.
Click to expand...

Wrong. Did you look at the federal Use of Force model I posted? This asshole completely ignored his training and shot Babbitt in the back. He deserves to be charged and tried for that.
 
LurchAddams said:
I don't know why any other cop didn't shoot anyone. They were within their rights to. Other's actions or inactions don't mean what the cop who shot Babbit was wrong, dude.

He was within his rights. She was committing a crime. It was a tragedy, like an accident, but the only guilty person is Babbit.
Click to expand...

You are completely wrong. The federal Use of Force rules show he failed to follow them and for that he should be criminally tried.
 
LurchAddams said:
Dude. He shot a trespasser. A criminal They were attacking us. Don't you care? The cops could have shot everyone - I'm glad they didn't - but they'd been within their rights to do so.

Get off your partisan hobby horse. She committed a crime. I'm sorry she's dead, but it wasn't the cop's fault. It was hers.
Click to expand...

That is not a partisan position. That cop reached through a bunch of armed, and armored cops to shoot into a crowd which was backed behind other cops. At that point, no retreat was possible.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top