Morality is all in your mind.

I told you multiple times how I arrive at these conclusions,

"Natural Law"? That's not very convincing.

Personally if someone can't tell me an actual physical reason why murder is wrong I get somewhat uncomfortable. I think it is better if someone actually knows why a moral rule exists.
 
like we discussed already, everyone picks and chooses.

Of course. But those who would tell others how great Christian morality is vs atheist morality often show neither.

One cannot expend 15 pages of telling everyone about the importance of the moral teachings of Jesus only to turn around in just about every other post and mock Jesus' teachings.

 
What moral conclusion?

:lolup: Why you cannot argue with dishonest leftist morons. :palm:

Morality is predicated on instinctual drives which are evolutionarily developed to provide safety in a social network.

So, you think that morality is inherent and not learned? How did you arrive at the patently stupid uneducated conclusion?
Humans have an added dimension in having an intellect that is capable of envisioning alternative outcomes based on choices, as such we have the added ability to review our choices.

What a laughable pile of moronic word salad. Humans are the only animals that have morals. All other life on earth does not.

Morality isn't a choice. Dumb.
 
:lolup: Why you cannot argue with dishonest leftist morons. :palm:



So, you think that morality is inherent and not learned? How did you arrive at the patently stupid uneducated conclusion?


What a laughable pile of moronic word salad. Humans are the only animals that have morals. All other life on earth does not.

Morality isn't a choice. Dumb.

Do you think you have a moral center? Interesting conjecture.
 
How does science have anything to do with morality? I can wait. What a stupid statement. :palm:
Because immoral behaviors are directly related to the conscious experience of living creatures. Abuse, sexual abuse, slavery, etc are immoral, scientifically speaking, because of the experiences of those being abused/enslaved. It would be immoral to enslave a dead person because there would be no way for them to experience the negative aspects of slavery.
 
There is nothing scientific or rational about risking your life and risking financial ruin to save thousands of strangers from the Nazis.

Everyone from evolutionary biologists to economists would call that an irrational act.
....and then there are others that would call that a MORAL act of unselfishness.
 
Of course. But those who would tell others how great Christian morality is vs atheist morality often show neither.

One cannot expend 15 pages of telling everyone about the importance of the moral teachings of Jesus only to turn around in just about every other post and mock Jesus' teachings.
people who can't define it jabber on and on about unrelated issues.
 
Back
Top