Daylight63
Verified User
Back to screaming at me in bolded all caps?
No. I just bolded it because you never answer the question. I can only assume it is because you know you've lost the entire debate long ago.
Back to screaming at me in bolded all caps?
If you want to believe Jesus of Nazareth was a supporter of kidnapping and enslaving humans, that's your choice.@Cypress: you seem to pay lip service to Jesus. Why do you think he was a good moral teacher? And why do you think some of his teachings were pure bullshit?
I told you multiple times how I arrive at these conclusions, but if you want to pat yourself on the back and spike the football for supposedly shredding all your interlocutors, that's your choiceyou know you've lost the entire debate long ago.
If you want to believe Jesus of Nazareth was a supporter of kidnapping and enslaving humans, that's your choice.
If you want to believe Jesus of Nazareth was a supporter of kidnapping and enslaving humans, that's your choice.
I told you multiple times how I arrive at these conclusions,
Morality suggests the presence of a mind. Not quite the same as intelligencetrue.
there is no authority.
there is only intelligence.
morality is intelligent.
If all this is true then there is no legitimate authority to tell people what they can and cannot do.
like we discussed already, everyone picks and chooses.So why do you treat so many of Jesus teachings with disdain if he was a source of absolute right and wrong in his teachings?
like we discussed already, everyone picks and chooses.
Take your own advice halfwit.Go away. Your version of "discussion" is not valid here.
How does science have anything to do with morality? I can wait. What a stupid statement.Sure it does. What things do you consider to be the most immoral?
What moral conclusion?
Morality is predicated on instinctual drives which are evolutionarily developed to provide safety in a social network.
Humans have an added dimension in having an intellect that is capable of envisioning alternative outcomes based on choices, as such we have the added ability to review our choices.
How does science have anything to do with morality? I can wait. What a stupid statement.
Why you cannot argue with dishonest leftist morons.
So, you think that morality is inherent and not learned? How did you arrive at the patently stupid uneducated conclusion?
What a laughable pile of moronic word salad. Humans are the only animals that have morals. All other life on earth does not.
Morality isn't a choice. Dumb.
Because immoral behaviors are directly related to the conscious experience of living creatures. Abuse, sexual abuse, slavery, etc are immoral, scientifically speaking, because of the experiences of those being abused/enslaved. It would be immoral to enslave a dead person because there would be no way for them to experience the negative aspects of slavery.How does science have anything to do with morality? I can wait. What a stupid statement.
....and then there are others that would call that a MORAL act of unselfishness.There is nothing scientific or rational about risking your life and risking financial ruin to save thousands of strangers from the Nazis.
Everyone from evolutionary biologists to economists would call that an irrational act.
people who can't define it jabber on and on about unrelated issues.Of course. But those who would tell others how great Christian morality is vs atheist morality often show neither.
One cannot expend 15 pages of telling everyone about the importance of the moral teachings of Jesus only to turn around in just about every other post and mock Jesus' teachings.