no one wants to take your guns liars
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
SmarterthanYou
rebel
can we start implementing competency tests for voting next? how about licensing authorized journalism? or free speech licenses? licenses to get abortions?
Yes indeed. Voters kill people. That is the same thing. Lots of journalists get killed, but they don''t threaten the people. Again, same thing as a childish angry person with a gun. Voters have to be qualified. They register providing the voters bureau with info. They are looked up to see if they qualify . So essentially, licensing. But that argument sucks. Gun owners are a threat to society and to innocent people. They re threats to their families.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
unbiased citation...........if you will. or is the mere presence of a gun sufficient for you to suggest the threat?
Voters are not looked up to see if they are U. S. citizens. As long as they check the box that says they are citizens the state cannot challenge that unless they have information to the contrary and none have the time to check that. As a result, many non-citizens register to vote every year. We know that is true because when state and federal courts send a jury summons stating the requirements include citizenship many people ask to be excused from jury service because they are not citizens and they are taken off the list. This comes from studies on both federal and state courts. AZ law tried to have applicants provide proof of citizenship and the federal courts struck down that law as violating federal law.
Some ask to be removed from voter registration rolls because their immigration attorney advises them to do so because it is breaking the law and could hurt their case for citizenship or extending legal residency. This applies to legal non-citizens, not illegal immigrants.
Русский агент
Путин - мl
Most firearm deaths are suicides. Doesn't that fact fill you with joy?
Your scheme to mandate "classes" is laughable. Think the Crips, Bloods, Latin Kings, and MS-13 are going to enroll in a class?
Русский агент
Путин - мl
I'm a gun owner. Show me where or how I am a "threat to society and to innocent people (and) threats to their families" and why?
Русский агент
Путин - мl
I wonder where Nerdberg got his "facts". Don't you?
“I don’t believe people should be able to own guns.”
President Barack Obama, during conversation with economist and author John Lott Jr. at the University of Chicago Law School in the 1990s
“Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe.”
"“If I could have banned them all – ‘Mr. and Mrs. America turn in your guns’ – I would have!”
Sen. Dianne Feinstein
https://www.outdoorlife.com/blogs/g...rol-quotes-politicians-and-celebrities#page-4
I think you need to research before making such claims. there are a ton of people who are on record as supporting gun confiscation.
The logic of voting for outsiders is horrible. Would you vote in Mexicos elections if you could get away with it? What would you know about the candidates. What would you risk? You come over here to make money and help your family. Would it make sense to jeopardize that to vote in an election that is meaningless to you? You are calling attention to yourself from the election board and authorities. You do show ID when you register. I have been in voter drives and we required it. In Mich. you have to show ID at the polls too.
You personally? Gun laws are about the masses. The millions of gun lovers. Having a gun in your home makes your family less safe. It increases the chances of them getting shot. http://www.slate.com/articles/healt...e_the_risk_of_homicide_accidents_suicide.html Unlike you gunners, I read.
Русский агент
Путин - мl
That study is contested, Nerdberg. The basis for Bangalore & Messerli's conclusions was international data from sources that are questionable at best. There are no reliable data available to arrive at the conclusions they did.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24054955
BTW, you have no basis for your own generalization regarding the reading habits of "gunners", and we both know it.
If you don't want a gun, don't buy one. I want them, and I will keep them.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
you also used bias sources that are known for being anti-gun/anti-2nd Amendment. I posit a question though, if you're not afraid to answer it. There are around a million law enforcement officers around the nation that keep guns in their homes. why would we allow that if having a gun in the home increases the chances of being shot and making the family less safe?
You don't have a case. YOU say I shouldn't own something yet the only thing you do is talk about it.
The only thing I am is someone that expect a person that says I shouldn't own something to do more than talk about it. That's all you've done, talk.
I wouldn't vote in Mexico's elections. That's because, unlike Mexicans that you lefties want voting in ours, I have ethics, morals, and respect that the laws don't allow me to do so. You, however, don't.
Since left-wingers do anything they can to cater to illegals from all places, the elections are not meaningless to those illegals. They can vote for left-wingers that support what they're doing despite it being against the law.
Русский агент
Путин - мl
Illegals know very well which party panders to them. They don't need to "know about the candidates". The history of the DEMOCRAT Party is rife with examples of immigrants being recruited by DEMOCRATS to vote the DEMOCRAT ticket in elections.
Tammany Hall ring a bell, Nerdberg? Boss Tweed?
BTW, in Michigan anyone can register by mail, submit forged or stolen documents, and lie about their citizenship status.
https://www.michigan.gov/documents/MIVoterRegistration_97046_7.pdf
They can also vote without an ID or voter registration card. If you're unable to provide acceptable photo identification, you can vote by signing an affidavit.
A voter only has to appear in person to vote the first time.
The DEMOCRAT Party opposes Voter ID laws, and I think I know why.