Basically what you are saying is, "Due to laws that prevent me from touching or groping women on their butts when I want to, I refuse to be a gentleman towards women"! That is about as misogynist as it is defined in the dictionary!
Any man afraid to hold a door open for a lady is a CHICKENSHIT without a cause!
And trying to blame "The Left", because of some state or local ordinance or law against spanking a grown person on the buttocks by a total stranger in public, has no merit or redeeming purpose.
However the law that protects individuals from being publicly humiliated by being physically or sexually abused in public does have a redeeming purpose.
And I don't care whether you are a Democrat or a Republican, a Trump ass-kisser or a Trump hater, if you are a male, and this victim of the physical assault were your wife, daughter, sister, mother, grand daughter, or personal friend, and you didn't see any problem with the assault by some total stranger, you are about as bad example of a male as the attacker himself.
This is where, people fail- when they don't have the ability to differentiate the difference between the consequences of having such groping and assault laws on the books from the consequences of not having such laws on the books.
Where do you draw the line? Because laws clearly do draw a line- and that line is "Any act of touching someone else anywhere on their person, at any time, or any place, against their will" is subject to assault charges.
If there were not laws like this on the books, you can only use your imagination as to how far some people would go to fondle or grope other human beings against their will at their own pleasure.
We can become a nation of pleasure seeking misbehaving monkeys, or we can have law and order. I choose law and order!