BidenPresident
Verified User
That is a surprise to James Madison who is the Father of the Constitution and specifically sought to prevent a democracy.
Cite Madison saying he wants to prevent a democracy.
That is a surprise to James Madison who is the Father of the Constitution and specifically sought to prevent a democracy.
WRONG. The United States is a federated republic. It is not a democracy.
'Constitutional republic' is redundant. A republic is government by constitution. Democracies have no constitutions or representatives.
It is true, strictly speaking.
WRONG. The Constitutions of this country determine how elections are conducted.
That's exactly what it does. It gives the smaller States a voice in selecting the President and Vice-President.
Or Wyoming and most other States being overshadowed by the SOTC or New York.
Presentism fallacy. It is not archaic, and neither is anything else in the Constitution. You are trying to destroy the Constitution.
The President is not elected by popular vote.
We the People do not vote for President. States legislatures do. See the Constitution of the United States.
The President is not elected by popular vote. The electoral college has not yet voted. That takes place on Jan 6th, and must conform to the Constitution. Enough States have filed Contested that there is no required Majority of the electoral college. This then turns to the House, following the procedures outlined in the 12th amendment.
You don't get to destroy the Constitution and then say you support the Constitution.
Cite Madison saying he wants to prevent a democracy.
Read Federalist #10. He says the main purpose of government is to "control factions" and he rejects democracy because the majority always wins. He chooses a republic as the best way to do what is in the best interests of all the people rather than the controlling faction.
Trump does not support a monarchy, dictatorship, or oligarchy. Neither does any conservative.Some would prob support a monarchy if trump would be the king............
No. It is on this thread. You brought it up here.But that is perhaps another thread......
You don't get to just throw away the Constitution. You are not the king.Personally I would prefer a parliamentary system-no winner take all & the power to call for early elections & no confidence votes rather than impeachment...
You are forgetting about the Socialist party, the Green party, the Libertarian party, and a whole host of smaller parties.Israel is a dot on the map w/ several parties to chose from, we are many, many times larger & have only two choices for the most part/for many..
Nope. The election process is defined in the constitutions in each layer of government.Those two self dealing/self serving parties control the process in every state, county/city....... They connive to undermine any challengers to their monopoly......
The election process IS embedded in the constitution for offices in that layer of government.They are not embedded in the constitution but they are in our asses & heads........
Okay. Let's look at some:They are the major problems in every major category....
Good point. The popular vote should determine the Presidency. Electoral College is like demanding we ride horses instead of cars.
I've read Federatlst #10. By "factions" he is referring to modern political parties.
It is broader than parties, it is any interest group:
"By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interest of the community."
I took your advice and this is what popped up:
"Voter ID laws deprive many voters of their right to vote, reduce participation, and stand in direct opposition to our country’s trend of including more Americans in the democratic process. Many Americans do not have one of the forms of identification states acceptable for voting. These voters are disproportionately low-income, racial and ethnic minorities, the elderly, and people with disabilities. Such voters more frequently have difficulty obtaining ID, because they cannot afford or cannot obtain the underlying documents that are a prerequisite to obtaining government-issued photo ID card."
https://www.aclu.org/other/oppose-voter-id-legislation-fact-sheet
Seems like there should be some way to make Voter ID easy and assessable to those that need it.
I also googled 'Earl, CountryBoy, and Legina' ... and yes, they all belonged to the 'Dinky Penis' web site. (just because it's a meme, doesn't mean it's true of ALL Red Team)
Sounds like he's describing Trump and the GOP.
That is why he opposed democracy--so that no faction could gain control of government. He tried to fragment governmental power as much as possible--separation of powers, checks and balances, separation of constituency, different terms of office, different methods of selection....
These safeguards prevented Trump from completing some of his policies.
Trump was properly impeached. He should have been removed from office. Trump was a neo-fascist and would be dictator.
Those are the safeguards made possible in a republic. Impeachment is just the first part of the process. 2/3 of the Senate did not believe Trump (or Clinton, or Johnson) should be convicted.
It is broader than parties, it is any interest group:
"By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interest of the community."
I see. You think a republic is a wholly other thing than a democracy. Like saying it's not the ocean, it's the sea.
Which is one reason I support Abortion. Do you support abortion, Bubba? Help cut down on those "parasites" you are complaining about?
Why do you put the word parasites in quote marks?? What term would you use to refer to people who make a living by pumping out baby after baby after baby??
Democracies have no constitutions.Appears "birdman" is totally confused again, a Constitution, any Constitution, is the framework of the Government, democracy is the ideology upon which that Constitution, our Constitution, is based.
Paradox.A republic is the system of government that allows a country to be democratic
Apparently it is for you.Really not all that difficult
Cite Madison saying he wants to prevent a democracy.
Yes it does, if not done as a constitution amendment.Changing voting would not destroy the constitution.
Yes. It's called a constitutional amendment. Election laws were changed WITHOUT authorization from the legislature of that State nor by any amendment.That was wrong, The constitution has legal methods to change it.
Contextomy fallacy. Argument from randU fallacy. There are not 27 amendments changing election law in the United States.We have 27 times.
Contextomy fallacy.Did each one destroy the constitution?
I choose to uphold the Constitution of the United States.If changing it has destroyed it, why do you care.
Paradox. Irrational statement.It is already destroyed many times. That made no sense.
Why?The point of the thread is about removing the electoral college.
No. It would require and amendment.It would require constitutional means.
Why?The EC is a bad system.
Minority is not a tyranny.It allows a tyranny of the minority.
It doesn't, but they do have a say, despite a majority.You like that the minority runs the country.