SO HOW MANY OF YOU LOVERS OF DEMOCRAZY WOULD...

No, we aren't you fucking retard. If you had a brain, you'd be embarrassed that Buck Tucker understands how our gov't works better than you do.

Well I'll take that as a back handed compliment! But it isn't saying much since evince is a brain dead leftist I think you could put him up against a spider monkey and he'd lose.
 
hes a founder you shit breath


I know its hard for you to READ BOOKS with your tongue jammed up Putins ass


that is not my fault

So let me get this straight are you still crying about the Ruskies in 2016? Fact the Mueller report with it's 18 angry democunts couldn't find any evidence that there was collusion between the Trump Campaign and Russia. After 2 years $35 million, countless hours of leftist media and former Osambo Admin Nomenclatura such as Brennan, and Clapper promising that Trump was a traitor, Mueller found nothing.

So you and that Shifty Shit boy Adam think you some how know more than Mueller and his 18 angry democunts.



Besides since you love Democrazy so much I'd think you would love Russia and Putin since he was elected with 70% of the Popular Vote in 2018. He's your kind of guy right.

And your Queen Bitch Hillary when Sec State arranged for 20% of the US Uranium supply to be sent to Russia and got $160 million donated to the Clinton Foundation. She and the DNC went through a law firm named Perkins Coie, the Democratic National Committee’s private law firm. They contracted with Fusion GPS, and former British Spy named Christoper Steele. Who was an FBI spook, used by the Obama Justice Dept, who went to Russia in an attempt to dig up dirt on Our Great President then candidate Trump. There was none so they created a phony Dossier and pushed it to the FBI and FISA courts to get warrants to Spy on the Trump Campaign. :eek2:



Of course you Leftist scumbags don't seem to mind when the Dims collude with Russia as was reported in The Hill.

It means the FBI had good reason to suspect the dossier was connected to the DNC’s main law firm and was the product of a Democratic opposition-research effort to defeat Trump — yet failed to disclose that information to the FISA court in October 2016, when the bureau applied for a FISA warrant to surveil Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

“This is a bombshell that unequivocally shows the real collusion was between the FBI and Donald Trump’s opposition — the DNC, Hillary and a Trump-hating British intel officer — to hijack the election, rather than some conspiracy between Putin and Trump,” a knowledgeable source told me.

https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/4...ll-dnc-lawyers-met-with-fbi-on-dossier-before


Your type also didn't mind when the "RUSSIANS" were known as Soviets as part of the USSR. Nothing was said in 1984 When the Lion of the Senate used one of his buddy John Tunney to go to the KGB and GRU to again dig up dirt on the Great Ronald Reagan. That's a fact motherfucker! Ted Kennedy and a friend of his went to the KGB for help defeating Reagan. And still lost.

he London Times revealed a 1983 KGB document from KGB chief Viktor Chebrikov to the then-leader of the USSR, Yuri Andropov. Chebrikov relayed an offer presented to the Soviet leaders from Kennedy, delivered in person by "Sen. Edward Kennedy's close friend and trusted confidant" John Tunney, a former Democratic senator who was Kennedy's law school roommate. This was reported on Realclearpolitics. com

Kennedy, according to the memo, offered to help the Soviets deal with Reagan, whom Kennedy perceived as a warmonger. Kennedy would "arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA." In exchange, Kennedy wanted Soviet aid in challenging Reagan's re-election. Kennedy offered to use his influential friends in liberal American media to arrange television interviews for Andropov. This would soften the Soviets' image, Kennedy suggested, and help brand Reagan as reckless and dangerous.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...ted_kennedys_outreach_to_the_ussr_134515.html
 
Canada is a constitutional monarchy rather than a republic.

I looked it up and the Monarch in question is Queen Elizabeth II. Not that she really has the power of a Monarch. You have to admit that the real Govt of Canada is a Republic. You vote for and elect your Member of Parliament and they select the PM.
 
It says that evince sucked a goats cock on MSNBC!

so your defense of what you claim to believe ( republican pudsuckery) is to merely lie


yeap seen that millions of times


your problem is this national debate cant be won with pudsuckery and lies shit dip
 
so your defense of what you claim to believe ( republican pudsuckery) is to merely lie


yeap seen that millions of times


your problem is this national debate cant be won with pudsuckery and lies shit dip

Listen smuck you may as well give up and go back to wacking off to your image of HRC in a black leather dominatrix outfit, because you're never gonna get the better of me in any argument. I don't care how many links you put in some post that you think proves your point. The fact is that you are a leftist/statist! You're not even good enough to be called an Apparatchik, you're nothing but a surf, a slave to the intelligentsia, the Coastal Elites have you by the balls.

It may not be your fault you probably had shitty up bringing with Parents who used drugs and didn't work, and are a product of the Public School System in some hell Hole Dim controlled city. I bet you're from Baltimore or Detroit.

You lack education and intellectual honesty just like all your kind, you are Pablum Puking half wits with scrambled grits and cream of wheat for brains.
 
Last edited:
It always cracks me up and makes me laugh when these low IQ miscreants start freaking out after I give them a lesson.


Here is this little boy evince still cater walling about his bitch HRC losing the election has to blame it on Russia, Russia, Russia. I'll present to you several facts for your consideration.

1. Russia did meddle in the 2016 election. They've been doing this since the 1920's.
2. The Obama Admin knew of it and did nothing.
3. Not one vote was changed. Unless you think that some troll posting Meme's on Facebook can change someone's mind.
4. The USA has meddled in the elections of many countries including Russia, The UK and France.
5. Russia did not favor Trump as the American Left has said since they lost.
6. Russia's intent was not to favor one candidate over another but rather to undermine the voters confidence in the electoral process.
7. The Democrat Party and the Modern Mass Media have been complicit in the Russian effort to undermine the voters confidence in the electoral process, by perpetuating this Hoax that Donald Trump cheated to get elected with the help of Russia.

8. With the help of the Democrat Party and their lap dogs in the Media the Russian efforts to undermine the voters confidence in the electoral process, have been a spectacular success.
 
I looked it up and the Monarch in question is Queen Elizabeth II. Not that she really has the power of a Monarch. You have to admit that the real Govt of Canada is a Republic. You vote for and elect your Member of Parliament and they select the PM.

The definition of democracy does not even require a chief executive much less one elected directly by the people. That is not what defines whether the U.S. or Canada is a democracy.

Has there ever been a nation which is a democracy?
 
The definition of democracy does not even require a chief executive much less one elected directly by the people. That is not what defines whether the U.S. or Canada is a democracy.

Has there ever been a nation which is a democracy?

you are arguing against every dictionary and Encyclopedia in the world idiot
 
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/democracy



Definition of democracy
1
a
: government by the people
especially : rule of the majority
b
: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free election

this is the definition of Democracy the world accepts


anything the idiots say on the internets is meaningless next to this
 
the people vote on WHO they want for WHATEVER office the PEOPLE CREATE


so shove that shit back in your mouth and swallow it


it has nothing to do with reality
 
The definition of democracy does not even require a chief executive much less one elected directly by the people. That is not what defines whether the U.S. or Canada is a democracy.

Has there ever been a nation which is a democracy?

its VERY easy to find a list idiot

have you EVER looked it up?
 
https://www.quora.com/What-countries-have-a-democracy


Additionally, the democracy index separates the countries into four categories: full democracies, flawed democracies, hybrid regimes and authoritarian regimes. There are only 20 countries classified as full democracies (Norway, Iceland, Sweden, New Zealand, Denmark, Switzerland, Canada, Finland, Australia, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Ireland, Germany, Austria, Malta, the United Kingdom, Spain, Mauritius, Uruguay and the United States of America) and 59 flawed democracies.
 
The definition of democracy does not even require a chief executive much less one elected directly by the people. That is not what defines whether the U.S. or Canada is a democracy.

Has there ever been a nation which is a democracy?

Yes but in Canada the People have no say in who the PM is. We are being told every day that we in the USA need to get rid of the Electoral College because the will of the people is subverted. We are told that Trump is not legitimate because he didn't win the popular vote. Isn't the function of the Electoral College very much like the PM of GB and Canada being elected by the Parliament?

The states assign their electoral votes based on who wins the popular election in that state.

But the laws in all 3 countries in question here are made by the elected Representatives not by the people voting, and in the case of GB and Canada the Monarch is only a figure head and has no say in the governing process.
 
Back
Top