Who would think otherwise?
(see response by Mason)
Who would think otherwise?
I know you've probably gone by dozens of names but they were just renamed accounts.
That's what he WANTS you to think Jade.
indeed. it costs time and money to put on a show.No, it would fall under the "pain in the ass" category.......
Who would think otherwise?
OK. Wait a minute. I have a question.
"Grind says "dozens",Mason laughably claims only 3!"
I don't have my reading glasses close by, is that 'claims only 31' ?
I have gone radio silent with USF. I never do this, but I have put USF on 'Ignore'. And while I was there, added Dark Soul as well. (why take a chance on getting a 60 day 'vacation', right?)
Ask Top and her bitch USF!
(and Phantasmal applauds my decision)
I don't know Mason. When Phantasmal agrees with me, I start having second thoughts.
(see response by Mason)
That's what he WANTS you to think Jade.
No, I know who his socks are. He's gotten angry with me for mentioning them even though he makes them obvious at times. I don't intend to mention anything anymore. If people can't figure it out themselves I don't really feel like teaching.
Phantasmal should re-name his/her self Phan-dismal, because their posts are usually quite dismal. NOT a lot of brain activity going on there.
Stone does claim to be very knowledgeable, with "law enforcement level evidence" to back it up...He can end all the "controversy" by just identifying the creator of each account... only three people involvedExcellent conclusion.
Stone does claim to be very knowledgeable, with "law enforcement level evidence" to back it up...He can end all the "controversy" by just identifying the creator of each account... only three people involved
Why protect those who don't protect him?
Indeed (But "some" seem to take it very seriously....yet are so misinformed;(You and I both know it's all part of the 'Fun & Games' at the JPP Family Fun Forum.
I know you've probably gone by dozens of names but they were just renamed accounts.
Stone does claim to be very knowledgeable, with "law enforcement level evidence" to back it up...He can end all the "controversy" by just identifying the creator of each account... only three people involved
Why protect those who don't protect him?
Indeed (But "some" seem to take it very seriously....yet are so misinformed;(