The ATF Expansion of the Gun Registry Turns Law-Abiding Gun Owners into Felons

SmarterthanYou said:
this is why you're not believable. you ignore actual history for your own deluded version. one that allows you to believe that a single chief justice knows what the 2nd Amendment means, despite dozens of pieces of historical evidence claiming otherwise.
Click to expand...

He discards the Constitution of the United States and all State constitutions. He also has a bad case of hoplophobia. Of course he doesn't know what it means.
 
Quincunx said:
The NRA Battleflag!
Click to expand...
Yeah, those gun-toting cowards, I bet you routinely bully and intimidate them. You probably kick sand in their faces, don't you?

You project that you yourself are a total coward, and now everyone knows that you deeply envy those who are not debilitatingly living in fear like you are.
 
IBDaMann said:
Yeah, those gun-toting cowards, I bet you routinely bully and intimidate them. You probably kick sand in their faces, don't you?

You project that you yourself are a total coward, and now everyone knows that you deeply envy those who are not debilitatingly living in fear like you are.
Click to expand...

LOL. Who is wetting their pants after ever mass shooting? Who is afraid of losing their guns? LOL. Buffoon.
 
Quincunx said:
LOL. Who is wetting their pants after ever mass shooting?
Click to expand...
The parents of school-age children.

Quincunx said:
Who is afraid of losing their guns?
Click to expand...
Gun owners. Of course, citizens who value liberty and personal safety are horrified as they watch a tyrannical government infringe more and more on their rights to keep and bear arms while the government claims that it isn't "infringing" ... that it is merely applying the same "common sense" that ANY tyrannical government would apply.
 
Guille said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
In Post #74, YOU inserted the statement and insinuation into the discussion, you blathering bumpkin! So my questions are more than applicable and justified. Clearly you lack the intellectual courage and honesty to ANSWER THE FREAKING QUESTIONS. Instead, you do the typical MAGA brain dead dodge by insisting that someone else answer a question that is merely your previous statements with a question mark

Sorry bunky, but it don't work that way. YOU made statements, the burden of proof is on YOU to validate them. If you can't, then stop wasting everyone's time with your painfully obvious BS.
Click to expand...



He asked one very simple question...more than once...that you have refused to address.
Click to expand...

No, it's a moot point that I didn't disagree with....remember I asked why does he think that things would be better if this circumstance that he remembers (generalized insinuation for the nation) would return?

But for the sake of further BS from you and RB, let's look the following:

https://time.com/4965022/deadliest-mass-shooting-us-history/

Now RB said implied that mass shootings weren't as prolific 30 years ago. The link tells a different story of (sadly) ebb and flow in the numbers. After 2004, however, things go off the chart....coinciding with the sunset of the 1994 AWB.

So as usual, when given ALL the facts, RB's gunner flunky rhetoric does not stand up to scrutiny.

I don't expect RB to answer my questions.....MAGA mooks and gunner flunkies are intellectually dishonest and cowardly in that respect. Hope this answers all your questions, Guillermo.
 
RB 60 said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
In Post #74, YOU inserted the statement and insinuation into the discussion, you blathering bumpkin! So my questions are more than applicable and justified. Clearly you lack the intellectual courage and honesty to ANSWER THE FREAKING QUESTIONS. Instead, you do the typical MAGA brain dead dodge by insisting that someone else answer a question that is merely your previous statements with a question mark

Sorry bunky, but it don't work that way. YOU made statements, the burden of proof is on YOU to validate them. If you can't, then stop wasting everyone's time with your painfully obvious BS.
Click to expand...


Not a word of your psychobabble can dispute the fact that guns were easier to get before your fucking kids started shooting up schools.
Click to expand...

No, it's a moot point that I didn't disagree with....remember I asked why doe you think that things would be better if this circumstance you remember (generalized insinuation for the nation) would return?

But for the sake of further BS from you, let's look the following:

https://time.com/4965022/deadliest-m...ng-us-history/

Now you said/implied that mass shootings weren't as prolific 30 years ago. The link tells a different story of (sadly) ebb and flow in the numbers. After 2004, however, things go off the chart....coinciding with the sunset of the 1994 AWB.

So as usual, when given ALL the facts, your gunner flunky rhetoric does not stand up to scrutiny.

I don't expect you to answer my questions.....MAGA mooks and gunner flunkies are intellectually dishonest and cowardly in that respect. Hope this answers all your questions.

Oh, and relying on calling everything you can't logically or factually refute as "psychobabble" is just plain dumb....akin to how INT squawks "fallacy" at every turn when defeated. You should watch that.
 
Taichiliberal said:
No, it's a moot point that I didn't disagree with....remember I asked why does he think that things would be better if this circumstance that he remembers (generalized insinuation for the nation) would return?

But for the sake of further BS from you and RB, let's look the following:

https://time.com/4965022/deadliest-mass-shooting-us-history/

Now RB said implied that mass shootings weren't as prolific 30 years ago. The link tells a different story of (sadly) ebb and flow in the numbers. After 2004, however, things go off the chart....coinciding with the sunset of the 1994 AWB.

So as usual, when given ALL the facts, RB's gunner flunky rhetoric does not stand up to scrutiny.

I don't expect RB to answer my questions.....MAGA mooks and gunner flunkies are intellectually dishonest and cowardly in that respect. Hope this answers all your questions, Guillermo.
Click to expand...

I know you did, and you did it as a dodge, and we all saw you do it.

I know you didn't ask for advice but I'm going to give it to you....too many words are a dead giveaway that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about and you use way too many words.
 
Guille said:
I know you did, and you did it as a dodge, and we all saw you do it.

I know you didn't ask for advice but I'm going to give it to you....too many words are a dead giveaway that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about and you use way too many words.
Click to expand...

Just another of his failed attempts at being relevant. He's not.
 
Guille said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
No, it's a moot point that I didn't disagree with....remember I asked why does he think that things would be better if this circumstance that he remembers (generalized insinuation for the nation) would return?

But for the sake of further BS from you and RB, let's look the following:

https://time.com/4965022/deadliest-m...ng-us-history/

Now RB said implied that mass shootings weren't as prolific 30 years ago. The link tells a different story of (sadly) ebb and flow in the numbers. After 2004, however, things go off the chart....coinciding with the sunset of the 1994 AWB.

So as usual, when given ALL the facts, RB's gunner flunky rhetoric does not stand up to scrutiny.

I don't expect RB to answer my questions.....MAGA mooks and gunner flunkies are intellectually dishonest and cowardly in that respect. Hope this answers all your questions, Guillermo.
Click to expand...


I know you did, and you did it as a dodge, and we all saw you do it.

I know you didn't ask for advice but I'm going to give it to you....too many words are a dead giveaway that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about and you use way too many words.
Click to expand...

:palm: Either you're truly incredibly dense or just a stubborn stupid troll. But hope springs eternal, so let's take it from the top:

Post #74, RB says it was easier to get guns 30 years ago.

I didn't disagree with that. I asked why does he think things would be better if we returned to that situation. He never answered that question.

He further implied that mass shootings weren't as prolific as they are now.

The link I provided shows that is not exactly true, as mass shooting numbers 30 years ago had their peaks and lows, as they have year after year to present.

So whatever implications RB's erroneous reminiscing concluded are wrong...along with whatever implications he thinks they carried.

So if correcting RB on the basis of his questions, WHICH INVALIDATES HIS QUESTIONS, is seen as a "dodge" by you and your equally intellectually impotent brethren, then that's your problem. Get a nearby high school teacher to explain it to you (history, English, science).

Oh, and as to your "advice"... :rolleyes: I feel sorry for you, as books, magazines, etc. must be torture for you. Carry on.
 
Quincunx said:
LOL. Who is wetting their pants after ever mass shooting? Who is afraid of losing their guns? LOL. Buffoon.
Click to expand...

you know what's funny? when shit hits the fan, the first person you call is someone with a gun............yet you want all guns removed from society. what does that make you?
 
If we're not going to start from scratch and give our constitution a page one re-write,

why don't we just accept that we live in a shooting gallery and stop talking about it?
 
NiftyNiblick said:
If we're not going to start from scratch and give our constitution a page one re-write,

why don't we just accept that we live in a shooting gallery and stop talking about it?
Click to expand...

what changes would you want, specifically with regards to civilian gun ownership, and how would you implement them?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
you know what's funny? when shit hits the fan, the first person you call is someone with a gun.
Click to expand...

Yes...a POLICEMAN. In other words: NOT YOU MOUTHBREATHING AMMOSEXUAL GRAVY SEAL TYPES.

...........yet you want all guns removed from society. what does that make you?
Click to expand...

No, I want guns in the most proper hands with the most training and the most restraint.

Again, NOT in the hands of gun fetishists like you.
 
Quincunx said:
Yes...a POLICEMAN. In other words: NOT YOU MOUTHBREATHING AMMOSEXUAL GRAVY SEAL TYPES.
Click to expand...
you've spent the last few years berating police departments, and police officers in general, for all of the minority murders and NOW you want only them to be armed?
you're a hypocrite who needs to use ad homs and generalizations to make yourself feel superior, when we all know you're not. you willfully ignore the millions of us veterans who ARE trained, ready, and in shape. good luck.

Quincunx said:
No, I want guns in the most proper hands with the most training and the most restraint.
Click to expand...
and, unlike the founding fathers, you believe only government gives you that?

Quincunx said:
Again, NOT in the hands of gun fetishists like you.
Click to expand...

I'm a well trained US Marine...........what are you? An incompetent and cowardly moron who begs government agents for protection?
 
In fact, the shootings in America show clearly that guns are not getting in the paws of the best people. We add 20 million a year to America's arsenal. That does not predict a kinder and safer America. It portends more and more school shootings, more accidental shootings more church shootings, and more suicides.
Every gun owner claims to have control over his guns and is a great shot. I have heard gun nuts in the past say they use a 22 for shooting skeet. Nobody ever said, I have a gun but have trouble hitting a target.
Fredo dropped the gun when the shooting started. So would almost all of you guys. Police are also bad shooters in a gun battle. Under that pressure, you untrained poorly practiced gun lovers would hit nothing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top