The ATF Expansion of the Gun Registry Turns Law-Abiding Gun Owners into Felons

It is harder to get a gun now than it was 30 years ago. And before that, you could mail order a rifle from Sears and buy a military surplus M-1 Garand (a semi-auto .30-06) at a hardware store.

Depends on where you live. In Michigan you could always get a gun but permitting was an issue 30 years ago. Today it's easier to get the permit.
 
Explain to the reading audience how returning to that way of doing things will help the current situation. More important, why do YOU think that practice was discontinued?

Who said it would? I made a simple point. Maybe you can tell the reading audience when guns were easier to get, why there wasn't all these shootings. Care to give it a shot, Mr. Prodigy?
 
Nobody is taking your guns away.
Correct. It is not possible.
The NRA won.
The NRA has nothing to do with it.
However military weapons designed for the battlefield have no place in society.
Buzzword fallacies.
A weapon that is designed for spraying bullets to kill as many people as possible, has no place in society.
Yes it does.

You are not going to take guns away. YOU CAN'T. You will be shot if you try.
 
We are adding over 20 million guns a year to America. Our enemies do not have to attack us. We are doing it by ourselves. They can watch us self-destruct as our weapons get stronger and stronger.

You ARE the enemy. You and the Democrats HAVE destroyed themselves.
 
Nobody is taking your guns away. The NRA won. However military weapons designed for the battlefield have no place in society. A weapon that is designed for spraying bullets to kill as many people as possible, has no place in society.

then you better start to taking them away from cops, because they have them.
 
Correct. It is not possible.

The NRA has nothing to do with it.

Buzzword fallacies.

Yes it does.

You are not going to take guns away. YOU CAN'T. You will be shot if you try.

There you go again. threatening shooting people. You are a poster boy for gun laws. You are far too immature to have a gun.
 
The NRA Battleflag!
Jeans.png
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Explain to the reading audience how returning to that way of doing things will help the current situation. More important, why do YOU think that practice was discontinued?

Who said it would? I made a simple point. Maybe you can tell the reading audience when guns were easier to get, why there wasn't all these shootings. Care to give it a shot, Mr. Prodigy?

In Post #74, YOU inserted the statement and insinuation into the discussion, you blathering bumpkin! So my questions are more than applicable and justified. Clearly you lack the intellectual courage and honesty to ANSWER THE FREAKING QUESTIONS. Instead, you do the typical MAGA brain dead dodge by insisting that someone else answer a question that is merely your previous statements with a question mark

Sorry bunky, but it don't work that way. YOU made statements, the burden of proof is on YOU to validate them. If you can't, then stop wasting everyone's time with your painfully obvious BS.
 
In Post #74, YOU inserted the statement and insinuation into the discussion, you blathering bumpkin! So my questions are more than applicable and justified. Clearly you lack the intellectual courage and honesty to ANSWER THE FREAKING QUESTIONS. Instead, you do the typical MAGA brain dead dodge by insisting that someone else answer a question that is merely your previous statements with a question mark

Sorry bunky, but it don't work that way. YOU made statements, the burden of proof is on YOU to validate them. If you can't, then stop wasting everyone's time with your painfully obvious BS.

Not a word of your psychobabble can dispute the fact that guns were easier to get before your fucking kids started shooting up schools.
 
In Post #74, YOU inserted the statement and insinuation into the discussion, you blathering bumpkin! So my questions are more than applicable and justified. Clearly you lack the intellectual courage and honesty to ANSWER THE FREAKING QUESTIONS. Instead, you do the typical MAGA brain dead dodge by insisting that someone else answer a question that is merely your previous statements with a question mark

Sorry bunky, but it don't work that way. YOU made statements, the burden of proof is on YOU to validate them. If you can't, then stop wasting everyone's time with your painfully obvious BS.

He asked one very simple question...more than once...that you have refused to address.
 
Do you think that made sense? Before we allowed every belligerent asshole on the street to have guns, the police did.

this is why you're not believable. you ignore actual history for your own deluded version. one that allows you to believe that a single chief justice knows what the 2nd Amendment means, despite dozens of pieces of historical evidence claiming otherwise.
 
There you go again. threatening shooting people. You are a poster boy for gun laws. You are far too immature to have a gun.

You damn will bet I'll shoot anyone trying to take guns by force. Unconstitutional 'laws' not withstanding. You cannot take guns away. Your insults will not save you.
 
In Post #74, YOU inserted the statement and insinuation into the discussion, you blathering bumpkin! So my questions are more than applicable and justified. Clearly you lack the intellectual courage and honesty to ANSWER THE FREAKING QUESTIONS. Instead, you do the typical MAGA brain dead dodge by insisting that someone else answer a question that is merely your previous statements with a question mark

Sorry bunky, but it don't work that way. YOU made statements, the burden of proof is on YOU to validate them. If you can't, then stop wasting everyone's time with your painfully obvious BS.

Asking the same question over and over that's already been answered is mindless, freako.
 
Back
Top