SmarterthanYou
rebel
he is no doubt a mentally ill russian
you are no doubt an escaped mental patient.
he is no doubt a mentally ill russian
Imagine if that first Amendment was suddenly ratified. We'd have a zillion Congresscritters.
Yeah...look at a significant minority of almost every forum in which Libertarians or American conservatives participate.
You'll see.
yeah, come back when you are smarter and make better sense, because all I see is a blathering idiot sticking to wrong and incorrect theories like he doesn't want to know better.
I don't think internet forums are necessarily representative of the American public.
I don't think those people do not want to be governed--they just don't want government regulations about stuff they oppose. Many of them would favor more regulations on imports, immigration.......
I guess that phony quoting is allowed here...but only a loser would use it.
It is known as satire, a legitimate form of communication.
You would have satire censored huh, Freedom loving Frank?
You are a hypocrite of the lowest order.
By the way, myopic idiot, this forum is a libertarian free speech forum.
You want sycophants, go join Libs R US.
They are. They may not be a fair indicator...or a valid indicator...but they are.
If they are not fair or valid then they are not representative. People who write on political forums are going to be more politically interested, have stronger opinions, and usually are more extreme left or right than most Americans--the same applies to presidential primary voters.
Okay, you've made your case...and done it well.
I'll concede the point.
I'll rephrase it to: My experience is that there are lots of people who seem not to want to be governed at all...or not nearly as much as a civilized society appears to require.
I don't disagree with you although we may differ on what percentage of Americans fit in that category. Would you include people like David Koresh or the Warren Jeffries sect in that group? They seemed to want very regulated governance but their their group (leader) rather than civil authorities.
I'm calm. Almost always. Ummm...maybe when I miss a short putt I get a bit agitated.
But in an Internet discussion...just about never.
But thank you for your concern.
You're being stupid Frank. Not sure if on purpose or not. The meaning of liberal and conservative has changed sine the Revolution. You are the Tory here, since you "seek a strong federal government with cradle-to-grave control over their lives."
then trump IS your president. embrace it, dumbass.
you are no doubt an escaped mental patient.
Why is so difficult for you to post without all that venom? Does hate so consume you that you must feed it to keep it contained?
The crap that guy is doing is NOT satire. It is misquoting!
I am not asking that it be censored...and I did not ask that it be censored.
I merely noted that it is the kind of thing someone with no spine or ethics would do.
For the record, it also is something no one with any real spine or sense of ethics would defend...by pretending it is just satire.
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight!!
I believe that Frank thinks he's a "wordsmith" and that his lengthy replies show a greater degree of intelligence, then those he's conversing with; all the while ignoring the fact that it makes him look pompous and an ass.
Add sanctimonious and judgemental to your unobserved list of personal charater defects.
And to think...at your age you could have been.....wise.
I coulda been a contenda.
But instead I find myself in a duel of wits with you...an unarmed opponent.
Oh, well.