FBI director casts doubt on whether Trump was actually SHOT
Christopher Wray told the the House Judiciary Committee that there was still some question about Trump's injuries during the assassination attempt.www.dailymail.co.uk
Was it really a bullet from an AR? Is that possible without more damage?
Im not a ballistics expert, but the FBI has them.
Already did idiot
but your SCOTUS made him king rememberHe is useless to her now. She isn't attracted to lame duck pedophiles.
LOL are you 100% absolutely POSITIVE it is a bullet in that picture. I guess you must have blown it up well over 1000X.It was a bullet...you've seen the footage and that award winning picture of it whizzing past his head...
There's no glass...anywhere...
LOL are you 100% absolutely POSITIVE it is a bullet in that picture. I guess you must have blown it up well over 1000X.
all we know for sure is there were shots fired and the photo shows SOMETHING .
one of those shots could have hit his ear, or it could have been glass from something or a piece of plastic from somebodies water bottle , how about somebody throwing something sharp at him. that is another possibility, YOU don't know and neither do the rest of us out here we were NOT there.
and until the SS / FBI are sure they got every shell casing for SURE and can match them up with every billet that came from them and do DNA testing on all of them we will not know for sure if it was a bullet that hit him or not.
and YOU say there was " NO GLASS ANYWHERE " just how do YOU know for SURE were you there? did you see the area where he was standing RIGHT after the shooting?
don't say there wasn't this or that unless you were there or have 100% positive PROOF that it was as you say.
as of right now YOU have NO positive proof of anything except there were shots fired ,
Have a nice day
LOL are you 100% absolutely POSITIVE it is a bullet in that picture. I guess you must have blown it up well over 1000X.
all we know for sure is there were shots fired and the photo shows SOMETHING .
one of those shots could have hit his ear, or it could have been glass from something or a piece of plastic from somebodies water bottle , how about somebody throwing something sharp at him. that is another possibility, YOU don't know and neither do the rest of us out here we were NOT there.
and until the SS / FBI are sure they got every shell casing for SURE and can match them up with every billet that came from them and do DNA testing on all of them we will not know for sure if it was a bullet that hit him or not.
and YOU say there was " NO GLASS ANYWHERE " just how do YOU know for SURE were you there? did you see the area where he was standing RIGHT after the shooting?
don't say there wasn't this or that unless you were there or have 100% positive PROOF that it was as you say.
as of right now YOU have NO positive proof of anything except there were shots fired ,
Have a nice day
Yes...aren't you? Award winning shot (no pun intended) from Pulitzer prize winning photographer...Would you like a link to hear him talk about taking it? Have a nice evening...LOL are you 100% absolutely POSITIVE it is a bullet in that picture. I guess you must have blown it up well over 1000X.
all we know for sure is there were shots fired and the photo shows SOMETHING .
one of those shots could have hit his ear, or it could have been glass from something or a piece of plastic from somebodies water bottle , how about somebody throwing something sharp at him. that is another possibility, YOU don't know and neither do the rest of us out here we were NOT there.
and until the SS / FBI are sure they got every shell casing for SURE and can match them up with every billet that came from them and do DNA testing on all of them we will not know for sure if it was a bullet that hit him or not.
and YOU say there was " NO GLASS ANYWHERE " just how do YOU know for SURE were you there? did you see the area where he was standing RIGHT after the shooting?
don't say there wasn't this or that unless you were there or have 100% positive PROOF that it was as you say.
as of right now YOU have NO positive proof of anything except there were shots fired ,
Have a nice day
OH so YOU actually took that photo and blew it up large enough to see for SURE it was a bullet?Yes...aren't you? Award winning shot (no pun intended) from Pulitzer prize winning photographer...Would you like a link to hear him talk about taking it? Have a nice evening...
I must have missed her condemnation of the flag burning....Let's see...Maybe the photo was a "cheap fake?"
The Stalinists have a great track record with that one...
Do you need the link? (It Definitely wasn't glass...)OH so YOU actually took that photo and blew it up large enough to see for SURE it was a bullet?
or are YOU just assuming it is because that is what you were told it was?
Have a nice day
Why would I do that?Yes...aren't you? Award winning shot (no pun intended) from Pulitzer prize winning photographer...Would you like a link to hear him talk about taking it? Have a nice evening...
Yes...and we have a picture of what injured him...It was not glass...Why would I do that?
didn't Trump say it just stung. then he realized he was hit by SOMETHING and was bleeding?
Have a nice day
That's why he kept the tampon on his head for so long.FBI director casts doubt on whether Trump was actually SHOT
Christopher Wray told the the House Judiciary Committee that there was still some question about Trump's injuries during the assassination attempt.www.dailymail.co.uk
Was it really a bullet from an AR? Is that possible without more damage?
Im not a ballistics expert, but the FBI has them.
LinkYes...and we have a picture of what injured him...It was not glass...
More like a cotexThat's why he kept the tampon on his head for so long.
Show us the solid mass in that pictureAny projectile will leave a streaking path pattern
Show the solid mass in the streak