He wanted me to claim that I was the Vigilante. I told him it wouldn't work and it would be still more obvious. Especially when I had already pointed out that I thought Mott was the Vigilante.
WEREWOLF LOUNGE: HOME OF BATTLE BREW AND BATTLE CATTLE
- Thread starter /MSG/
- Start date
He wanted me to claim that I was the Vigilante. I told him it wouldn't work and it would be still more obvious. Especially when I had already pointed out that I thought Mott was the Vigilante.
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
I still can't get over the morning after that Wolfy pile on winter, christy and billy charged out to accuse each other lmao. But the best was usf swooping in to "clear" the two players the seer had already cleared to establish his cred, and then use that to try and get Damo off the hook. It was very funny.
mott at #522:
mott, you gotta follow your first intuition more.
####
winterborn @ #820:
Also known as the concept of deadair/dead villager. Tried and true. Accurate ~90% of the time o_o
####
christie @ 1186:
This is one of the most underrated posts of the entire game, if not the best post. This is solid logic, solid initiative, solid detective work. Very useful at a time where people were still confused over the peeks. This is what we need to see more of in every game.
mott, you gotta follow your first intuition more.
####
winterborn @ #820:
Also known as the concept of deadair/dead villager. Tried and true. Accurate ~90% of the time o_o
####
christie @ 1186:
This is one of the most underrated posts of the entire game, if not the best post. This is solid logic, solid initiative, solid detective work. Very useful at a time where people were still confused over the peeks. This is what we need to see more of in every game.
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
Because I don't believe you thought I was the seer, and I don't believe if you were pretty sure rana was the seer but I might be, you would have killed me instead of rana. Now, if you had said you thought I was the seer because I seemed so convinced sf was a villager, which is what I thought you might actually have taken the wrong way, then I'd have believed you. But what you said just doesn't make sense to me sorry. It doesn't matter, you're the one who won't let it go. I want to drop it, but you want me to agree with you first. I can't, so let's just drop it. Or mabe we should talk about it off board butmim tired so it'll have to be tomorrow.
if anything you were one of the most active players. I think you still ended up with the highest post count in the thread even after dying n1
The thing of it is they weren't killed because they suspected me. Seriously. Nobody had voted for me up until the Rana vote just before night on Day 2. I wasn't very threatened. We killed them because we thought they could be the Seer. Everybody suspected me at some point or another that first and second day. Mostly because I couldn't post as much as I wanted to.
Darla, because we had the block as well as the kill we tried to cover both. The reality is we suspected you of being the seer, that was the only reason we killed you, and why I was supposed to block Rana. We couldn't kill you both, the only way to cover you both was to kill one and block the other.
I was looking for a "Hidden Message" but I knew you would be more careful than that because that was how I had found Onceler the previous game. Since we had almost nothing to go on but feel, we tried to cover both bases... (again, I am sorry wolves I was supposed to have blocked Rana but screwed it up somehow. I must have had Mott on the brain for some reason...)
darla, I am almost positive that no one plays this game to just fuck with people. especially not when one is a wolf. You weren't killed because of any vendetta reason.
When one loses as a villager, it's not that bad. Village can't be expected to be right, the blame isn't always on the villager, sometimes it's not the villagers fault at all.
When you get killed as a wolf, it's because your team fucked up somewhere, usually.
As such, a wolf loss is a much bigger hit to the ego. And thus, wolves aren't going to be wasting precious nightkills on rando darla kills "just because" wolves want to win more than anyone else in the game.
When one loses as a villager, it's not that bad. Village can't be expected to be right, the blame isn't always on the villager, sometimes it's not the villagers fault at all.
When you get killed as a wolf, it's because your team fucked up somewhere, usually.
As such, a wolf loss is a much bigger hit to the ego. And thus, wolves aren't going to be wasting precious nightkills on rando darla kills "just because" wolves want to win more than anyone else in the game.
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
I'm not sure why people have such a hard time understanding me. I know I wasn't killed because anyone had a vendetta against me. When has Damo ever had a vendetta against me? Of course not. That's not at all what I said. Madone.
roleblocker can definitely change seer hunt dynamics. A seer without a peek is a villager. nothing more. Sometimes, one could even argue it's better to take out strong players while blocking the seer (assuming you are ~100% confident on who the seer is). You can't roleblock a strong player at night, but you can a seer. So blocking a seer and killing a strong player n1 is actually a pretty good strategy and would end up with a higher net gain for the wolves.
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
Okay so you misspoke when yo said you were pretty sure rana was the seer but killed me just in case. Actually you were pretty sure I was the seer. Maybe your ego was talking then Damo, And caused you to say something that doesn't really make sense. Which is your fault, not mine for noticing it didn't make sense.
darla remind me to never play monopoly with you.
I didn't say that. I said we were pretty sure that one of you was the seer so we used the option that neutralized both. And I killed you because I noted in the previous game how many players seem to discount Rana. I thought she would be less of a threat for that day because of that. I thought we'd be neutralizing the Seer either way.
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
Yeah that would have bee a good story too. Lol.
In this game I'm not sure why we had a seer anyway. She did a great job but no one noticed and just went about their business clueless as if she hadn't been killed and exposed as the seer...
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
Nope. Not what you said.
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
No one in my family will play that with me, so why do you say that? That's weird you said that.
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
See here's the post Damo, in case you get confused again.
It is what I said.
Here is the full post. You are clearly working hard at convincing yourself that I somehow did it for personal reasons but didn't do it for personal reasons...