PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
not to mention a huge jump in biology, chemistry, physics.....Huge jump in logic there. Fail.
not to mention a huge jump in biology, chemistry, physics.....Huge jump in logic there. Fail.
Didn't Christ say that everything he could do, so too could you with Faith? It appears that these scientists had enough Faith in their ability to create artificial DNA that they went and did it.
nothing....he always existed
That's convenient for him. How does that work exactly?
and you keep ignoring the fact that your scientists didn't create a new living organism, they simply altered an already living one
They have mixed chemicals together (for what are proteins but chemicals) to create new life.
first you would have to create new life, neh?If being god is the being able to create new life, then we have mastered 'god'.
why should I fear some philosopher's silly posturing?.....And you shouldn't be afraid of the nihilistic nature of existence.
???....nothing....he always existed......
Didn't Christ say that everything he could do, so too could you with Faith? It appears that these scientists had enough Faith in their ability to create artificial DNA that they went and did it.
Now for the important part, life evolves, we need to be careful with this stuff or we may just inadvertently create our own destruction.
(Of course, IMO, since we are all portions of that which makes up "god" this is no different than "and God created a single cell life form"...)
ah but a bit of a problem....Christ said if they had faith in HIM they could do anything he could do.....if they only have faith in their ability to do it, then it follows they will only do the things their ability could accomplish.....
ah but a bit of a problem....Christ said if they had faith in HIM they could do anything he could do.....if they only have faith in their ability to do it, then it follows they will only do the things their ability could accomplish.....
The point of faith in God is the same now as it was before this amazing piece of news.
Whether God created the universe in 7 days or in 700 millenia is irrelevant to me.
God provides me with comfort, inspiration, and hope. The rest is just trivial details for arguments.
Your comfort, inspiration, and hope is a trivial detail. The nature of the universe is not.
You're spinning now. That's not even cognizant.What else is there? There is no middle between the natural and supernatural. It was created by one or the other.
If it is not created by the supernatural, it must be natural.
Something that is created by man, through man's evolving thought processes, is still natural.
Anyway, I'm not even searching for the origins of the universe right now. I'll do that if I ever get my Astronomy degree. Right now I'm just putting one theory that has gotten far more credence and has been taken far more seriously than it ever deserved in its place.
Those who use the bible as a history book are misguided.
Those who seek to "disprove" the bible are wasting their time.
Not disprove. Use proper epistemology to make it clear when it is a good time to generally say that you "know" something. Usually something that can't conceivably be disproven is disregarded as "not even wrong".
Neither side of the argument can actually prove very much.
I understand the scientific terminology.
There are an infinite amount of things I can't disprove; ideas that can be structured specifically in a way as to make disproof practically impossible. (Most) people don't believe in many of them. The only exception is this mass delusion of god.
Those who use the bible as a history book are misguided.
Those who seek to "disprove" the bible are wasting their time.