I put Bush II and Obama as 1 and1A for the worst
Why do you think Obama was the worst when Presidential historians put him among the top 10?
I put Bush II and Obama as 1 and1A for the worst
Totally disagree. Clinton got 3,000,000 more votes than Trump, and her total vote count was surpassed only by Obama in 2008 and 2012....and the margin between 2012 and 2016 was statistically insignificant.
She most definitely did not quit campaigning. Spending more time in those states wasn't going to counteract the Russian interference efforts on social media. It's silly to imagine her physical presence in those states would have counteracted the Russian narratives specifically targeting those states.
That is as pathetic as a baseball team that lost bragging about getting more hits.
She did quit campaigning, she and most of us thought she had it in the bag
Actually, Trump has proven having a physical presence can make a difference.
Less than 1% between 3 states was the difference in the election.
As I stated, his first year things were good, but his first year he just golfed a lot and held pep rallies, he did not do anything stupid like starting a trade war.
The DJI is up about 25% since Trump took office, at this same point under Obama it was up 38%.
So yeah, 4900 points in 22 months is not really all that good.
It is not great, but all of my post were about this year, not the previous one.
You all seem to have some serious reading compression issues.
Did you make it past the 4th grade?
he took the help of a hostile foreign government to Thwart our Democracy
I think Trump is a better POTUS than Obama and in your little sheep mind I am still a Prog because I will not swallow after I blow him like you do.
You partisan sheep are so damn boring...the same on every forum.
You lack the basic intelligence to understand that a few of us are not do not fall under either party.
From a Canadian POV, Obams is being seriously considered to be one of the best. That is because he did a huge amount of good toward eliminating racism in the US
I'd say calling Nazis "very fine people" is just as bad as illegal invasions and occupations of sovereign nations.
I'd say taking Russia's side in targeted poisonings, taking Saudi Arabia's side in murdering journalists, and taking North Korea's side on sanction relief is just as bad, if not worse, than the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq.
I'd say not accepting what the US Intelligence Agencies tell him is pretty fucking horrible.
I never questioned Bush the Dumber's loyalty to this country; however, I do question Trump's.
Those things are all bad, but none of the compare to more than 4000 dead and 30,000 wounded US service members.
DUH? I bet all of your heroes are White Guys! Ok! Thanks for your input! LOL! We get it!
There is no comparison of legitimate presidents to one man who was never legitimate to begin with!
Go ahead and write that book! The vocal majority will never buy it! But, I dare you to try! LOL!
Come on...of course he did. That's why you cheat...to win. You don't cheat to lose.
Totally disagree. Clinton got 3,000,000 more votes than Trump, and her total vote count was surpassed only by Obama in 2008 and 2012....and the margin between 2012 and 2016 was statistically insignificant.
She most definitely did not quit campaigning. Spending more time in those states wasn't going to counteract the Russian interference efforts on social media. It's silly to imagine her physical presence in those states would have counteracted the Russian narratives specifically targeting those states.
The point is that your assertion that her campaign was poorly run is wrong. It's you searching for a way to blame Clinton for Russia's efforts to help Trump get elected.
If Russia wasn't working on Trump's behalf with the GOP's support, Trump would have lost.
Might be time for you to delete this account of yours and create a new one to re-position yourself on the boards.
Who are you, really? What's the ID you ditched to create this new one, and why did you ditch your old ID?
I have never been on this board before.