I only have one question….

[Dutch Uncle]

He is innocent until proven guilty in the eyes of the law. That does not mean I have to believe he is innocent, it only means the government cannot impose a criminal penalty.

I believe O.J. was clearly guilty, but he was found not guilty under the rules of criminal law. He still had to pay a huge judgement.

No, he did not.

A $33 million civil wrongful death judgment was obtained in 1997 against Simpson. The judgment was not paid in any meaningful way for the past 27 years and, with interest, has grown to over $100 million.
https://www.kiplinger.com/retirement/how-did-oj-simpson-avoid-paying-the-brown-and-goldman-families

You haven't been right this century.

Now the families have a shot at the estate.

Regardless, IIRC, the judgment was partly what drove OJ to commit a violent robbery crime which put him in prison for 9 years on a sentence of 33 years with the chance parole in 9.

I don’t know all of OJ’s problems, but his life started going downhill after the murders. He defaulted on mortgages, pissed away all of his money and became a hot mess. Was it guilt? Mental illness? Both? IDK, but clearly his life ended badly and not happily as it should have for someone of his career and opportunities.

 

[Jarod]

Oh ok. Let's start with what year did this rape happen?

There's far more evidence that OJ murdered his wife than evidence trump raped a gold digger.

I don’t know

 

[Jarod]

I thought it was never recovered.

Some of it was, and the judgment is still out there, his estate will pay some of it. I think only a couple of million has been paid thus far.

 

[Jarod]

It didn’t happen in another state so no rape.

What is your personal definition of rape?

 

[Jarod]

It wasn’t…with interest it’s more than 100 million dollars that the families will never see.

More than one percent of it has been paid

 

[Jarod]

It didn’t happen in another state so no rape.

So you are okay with NY defined sexual assault and not rape?

 

[T. A. Gardner]

So you are okay with NY defined sexual assault and not rape?

I not okay with NY state changing their laws to give E. Jean Carroll a one-year window in which to file a civil suit against Trump when the statute of limitations had already run out and then changed their laws back. That her case was the ONLY one filed in that one-year window kind of seems to me to be a bit too specific and obviously a case of "get Trump" by NY state.

 

[Jarod]

I not okay with NY state changing their laws to give E. Jean Carroll a one-year window in which to file a civil suit against Trump when the statute of limitations had already run out and then changed their laws back. That her case was the ONLY one filed in that one-year window kind of seems to me to be a bit too specific and obviously a case of "get Trump" by NY state.

That is simply untrue, there were quite a few such cases filed.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

I not okay with NY state changing their laws to give E. Jean Carroll a one-year window in which to file a civil suit against Trump when the statute of limitations had already run out and then changed their laws back. That her case was the ONLY one filed in that one-year window kind of seems to me to be a bit too specific and obviously a case of "get Trump" by NY state.

Something Traitor Trump can certainly appeal.

 

[Jarod]

I not okay with NY state changing their laws to give E. Jean Carroll a one-year window in which to file a civil suit against Trump when the statute of limitations had already run out and then changed their laws back. That her case was the ONLY one filed in that one-year window kind of seems to me to be a bit too specific and obviously a case of "get Trump" by NY state.

You failed to answer my question, telling!

 

[T. A. Gardner]

That is simply untrue, there were quite a few such cases filed.

E. Jean Carroll’s Victory: Using Lookback Windows for Sexual Abuse Claims
https://natlawreview.com/article/e-jean-carroll-s-victory-using-lookback-windows-sexual-abuse-claims

106, all following the success and publicity of Carroll's case.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

So you are okay with NY defined sexual assault and not rape?

What is NY's definition?

 

[Yakuda]

I don’t know

And to no ones surprise neither does the supposed victim. So she doesn't know when it happened but people who werent even there decided something happened even though no one knows when it happened.

 

[Yakuda]

What is your personal definition of rape?

One criteria should that the victim at least know what year the alleged rape happened. It might be a stretch to ask the alleged victim of the rape to remember the exact time and date but the year be pretty easy to recall.

 

[Jarod]

E. Jean Carroll’s Victory: Using Lookback Windows for Sexual Abuse Claims
https://natlawreview.com/article/e-jean-carroll-s-victory-using-lookback-windows-sexual-abuse-claims

106, all following the success and publicity of Carroll's case.

So you lied?

 

[Jarod]

What is NY's definition?

What Trump was found to have done, forcibly inserted his finger in her vagina against her will.

 

[Jarod]

And to no ones surprise neither does the supposed victim. So she doesn't know when it happened but people who werent even there decided something happened even though no one knows when it happened.

That is not a required element to the crime.

 

[Jarod]

One criteria should that the victim at least know what year the alleged rape happened. It might be a stretch to ask the alleged victim of the rape to remember the exact time and date but the year be pretty easy to recall.

You should promote such reforms if you want that to be a requirement.

Such victims have reported that they were so traumatized for such a period of time that they did not know the date or time.

 

[Yakuda]

That is not a required element to the crime.

Makes sense. There should no reason to know what year a supposed crime took place.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

One criteria should that the victim at least know what year the alleged rape happened. It might be a stretch to ask the alleged victim of the rape to remember the exact time and date but the year be pretty easy to recall.

1) The jury heard all the evidence from both the Defense and the Prosecution.
2) Trump is free to appeal the ruling.
3) Half-assed opinions of JPP MAGAts aren’t admissible in that appeal.