It was not past the statue of limitations.... That is a lie.
Enhancing a crime based on other actions/crimes (not charges) is common.
We can’t have a president under indictment!
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Enhancing a crime based on other actions/crimes (not charges) is common.
Yet, when asked a question, you haven't defended your lies and continue to flail, deflect and insult. Is it because you know that your comments are patently false and indefensible?
Wrong. It is malfeasance when a jurists acts unconstitutionally and places his heavy hand on the scales of justice.
This case should have been kicked out at the very beginning. But Marchand is a conflicted partisan with obvious TDS.
Yes, it was. Every legal expert has stated it has, which is why Bragg had to bootstrap it to some obscure Federal election crime he never felt compelled to prove.
Why all the lies and deflecting?
Not in a case like this. If you are going to charge a felony based on a federal election, it is out of the States jurisdiction.
I do wish you knew what you are babbling about.
Democrats? Absolutely. But it always catches up to them and exposes them as corrupt, dishonest, grifters and fools.
This is why we should require IQ tests to vote. 
Three YEARS past the statute of limitations.
You lying won't alter that.
Show us this "other crime?"
Show us any case where such enhancement is present, but no underlying crime is demonstrated or proven?
Amusing fact, Presiding Cunt Merchan is guilty of what he accuses Trump of.
{
- Judge Juan Merchan: Merchan made two small political contributions in 2020, in violation of New York’s Judicial Code of Ethics. One was to the presidential campaign of Joe Biden. The other was to an organization named “Stop Republicans.” The NY Commission on Judicial Conduct issued a warning to Merchan for the violations.}
Look at Florida's 10-20-LIfe law.
Florida 10-20-Life law.
SOl not three years if its charged as a Felony. It was charged as a felony.
Florida 10-20-Life law.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
RC laughs at your feigned ignorance.....
Political donations do not violate the code of ethics.
Again, what was the felony? Leftist halfwits seem to be the only ones who know what it is but refuse to tell us. Do share!
Word salad. The case in Manhattan wasn't about Federal election violations. It wasn't about donations. It was about Banana Republic style malfeasance by a conflicted DA and a partisan acting state Supreme Court justice who should have recused himself and allowed a venue change.
Perhaps.
But I was a serious DeSantis supporter (still am). But the attacks on Trump left me no choice but to support him. Our elections and system of government are under attack - there is no choice other than Trump if the Constitution is to survive. I know a lot of people who feel the same way. If not for the war democrats are waging on free and fair elections to stop Trump, I think there is a good chance DeSantis would be the nominee.
I think they will do everything they can to corrupt and cheat the election. When they lose, they will become extremely violent.
Trump has proven he will do anything he can think of to corrupt and cheat the system
That isn't what the jury found. They found that Trump was involved in a plot to pay off women so his marriage transgressions would not reach the public. That connects them to the election. The bus audio was dying down. He figured he could not remind the voters what a jerk he is.
Take it up with the NY Bar.
Merchan violated what he accuses Trump of.
Double standard? Well, of course.
Also, figure out how Merchan was able to violate due process by prosecuting a charge that had a 48 month statute of limitations 7 years later?
Oh right - pure corruption - that's how banana republics with no rule of law work.
I did not say it was... You are correct.
Merchan did not accuse Trump of anything.
Are you suggesting what Trump did was not corrupt?