Florida snatches parental authority!

[Into the Night]

I'm ok with citizens in the state I don't live making choices I would not make

this is just liberals (and tards like into the night) crying for no reason - list the social media companies that don't already have a ban on 13 year olds. almost all of them do. and unless the social media company is onlyfans or the sort, no age verification exists

nothing will stop kids from lying on the signup forms.

So you and I agree.

 

[Into the Night]

So this is a problem? How so? Should minors have unfettered access to the internet and social media? Yes or no?

How are you going to stop it? Just what is the mechanism to stop it?

 

[ZenMode]

you have entered the slippery slope now. how/who gets to decide that a spank is ok, a buckle is not?

or that Breakfast Club is ok, but Debbie Does Dallas is not?

There will always be differing opinions when it comes to punishment vs abuse. The question of when hitting kids crosses the line into abuse is a much different question than telling parents they can't allow their <14 year old kids to surf TikTok.

 

[zymurgy]

So you and I agree.

I think you are an idiot.

so maybe......

 

[zymurgy]

There will always be differing opinions when it comes to punishment vs abuse. The question of when hitting kids crosses the line into abuse is a much different question than telling parents they can't allow their <14 year old kids to surf TikTok.

exactly. so allowing smaller governing bodies to decide is the best path forward.

 

[ZenMode]

exactly. so allowing smaller governing bodies to decide is the best path forward.

I don't know what that means, but this is clear government overreach regardless of the size of the governing body.

 

[zymurgy]

I don't know what that means, but this is clear government overreach regardless of the size of the governing body.

There will always be differing opinions - so how do we best minimize the difference in opinions?

 

[Into the Night]

There will always be differing opinions when it comes to punishment vs abuse. The question of when hitting kids crosses the line into abuse is a much different question than telling parents they can't allow their <14 year old kids to surf TikTok.

Apparently, to zymurgy, there is no difference.

 

[zymurgy]

Apparently, to zymurgy, there is no difference.

^derp derp

 

[Into the Night]

I think you are an idiot.

so maybe......

Stop insulting someone that agrees with you. You only wind up insulting yourself.

list the social media companies that don't already have a ban on 13 year olds. almost all of them do. and unless the social media company is onlyfans or the sort, no age verification exists

nothing will stop kids from lying on the signup forms.

I agree with you here.

 

[Into the Night]

exactly. so allowing smaller governing bodies to decide is the best path forward.

...such as?

 

[zymurgy]

...such as?

^derp

 

[zymurgy]

Stop insulting someone that agrees with you. You only wind up insulting yourself.


I agree with you here.

you are too stupid to understand why we don't agree. it's comical how you pose as someone intelligent and not a mouth breather

derp derp - fallacy - derp derp

 

[ZenMode]

There will always be differing opinions - so how do we best minimize the difference in opinions?

Electing better people to governmental positions that involve decision making and laws and vote out those who make bad decisions?

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

I don't know what that means, but this is clear government overreach regardless of the size of the governing body.

Yes, it is, and I expect that it will be both challenged and overturned.

 

[Into the Night]

^derp

So you refuse to answer the question.

 

[Into the Night]

you are too stupid to understand why we don't agree. it's comical how you pose as someone intelligent and not a mouth breather

derp derp - fallacy - derp derp

You don't agree with your own post????!?
You are locked in paradox now.

 

[Into the Night]

Electing better people to governmental positions that involve decision making and laws?

Not good enough. There are differing opinions on who is 'better people'. You'll have to find a better answer to his question than that!

 

[zymurgy]

You don't agree with your own post????!?
You are locked in paradox now.

We clearly have disagreements here retardo

sorry you lack reading comprehension

 

[zymurgy]

Electing better people to governmental positions that involve decision making and laws?

and who decides if the person we elect is better? you?