Talk of bringing back the MILITARY DRAFT even though 13th amendment bans it

SmarterthanYou said:
you've started drinking already? bit early, isn't it?

you know you defended them, but nice try.

if MY violent friends ever start murdering americans, you can rest assured that civil war has already broken out and everyone is going down
Click to expand...

Quote me if you're not lying.

Only domestic terrorists use the term "civil war" to legitimize their terrorism of innocent Americans. Fuck all of them D-E-A-D.

61h831.gif
 
The States should organize more militia until we have no security problems in our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Click to expand...

We have a Second Amendment; don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and Regulate them Well!
 
SmarterthanYou said:
just stop. you're embarrassing yourself. many times you said they were just trying to disarm an active shooter.


war has casualties..........you should know this. don't be such a pacifist idiot
Click to expand...

Translation: I got nuthin' except insults and lies.

Figures. Are you really so fucking stupid you don't know how to use the advanced search feature? Or is it more likely you're a lying terrorist supporter?

Like Putin targeting civilians in total war, you and your domestic terrorist fuckwads have no qualms about murdering children. Yeah, I get it but I still don't agree with terrorist fuckwads.

Funny how you get all bent out of shape when I mention killing domestic terrorists but you remain so casual about murdering innocent Americans and their kids.

I'm not a pacifist, dipshit. I'm against killing kids to further your political agenda. Get a fucking clue before the FBI shoots you and your terrorist friends in the fucking head.

68ll8a.jpg
 
Right-wingers are losing all credibility and standing for refusing to volunteer for the organized militia to solve our security problems in our free States.

We have a Second Amendment. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and Regulate them Well.
 
That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
your translators broken, much like your sense of patriotism/americanism, or your sense of reality, for that matter.
Click to expand...

Translation: You're right, Dutch, I'm a lying fuckwad terrorist who supports murdering children as long as it overthrows the US government and installs a White Supremacist dictatorship. Make America White Again!


I support We, the People in neutralizing all domestic terrorists with extreme prejudice. Yes, even your white supremacist asshole friends.

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...-candidate-wants-to-make-america-white-again/
An independent candidate running for the U.S. House in Tennessee is raising eyebrows with a campaign sign that reads “Make America White Again.”

Rick Tyler, running for the seat held by Rep. Chuck Fleischmann (R), told a local NBC affiliate that he doesn’t have hatred in his heart for “people of color.”

{mosads}He said the sign is meant to return America to a “1960s, ‘Ozzie and Harriet,’ ‘Leave it to Beaver’ time when there were no break-ins, no violent crime, no mass immigration.”
Click to expand...

ricktyler_billboard.jpg
 
danielpalos said:
That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.
Click to expand...

The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)]

The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the high powers" delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.' A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power." [Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859)]

The congress of the United States possesses no power to regulate, or interfere with the domestic concerns, or police of any state: it belongs not to them to establish any rules respecting the rights of property; nor will the constitution permit any prohibition of arms to the people; or of peaceable assemblies by them, for any purposes whatsoever, and in any number, whenever they may see occasion. —ST. GEORGE TUCKER'S BLACKSTONE

The right of citizens to bear arms is just one more guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against tyranny, which though now appears remote in America, history has proven to be always possible. — Senator Hubert H. Humphrey

As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms. — Tench Coxe in `Remarks on the First Part of the Amendments to the Federal Constitution' under the Pseudonym "A Pennsylvanian" in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789 at 2 col. 1.

The writings of scholars who have written on the subject are virtually united on the point that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms, not simply the state national guards. — PROFESSOR GLENN HARLAN REYNOLDS

That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of The United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms... — Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, at 86-87

The people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possession of them. — Zachariah Johnson, 3 Elliot, Debates at 646

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them. — George Mason, during Virginia's Convention to Ratify the Constitution (1788)
 
SmarterthanYou said:
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)]

The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the high powers" delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.' A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power." [Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859)]

The congress of the United States possesses no power to regulate, or interfere with the domestic concerns, or police of any state: it belongs not to them to establish any rules respecting the rights of property; nor will the constitution permit any prohibition of arms to the people; or of peaceable assemblies by them, for any purposes whatsoever, and in any number, whenever they may see occasion. —ST. GEORGE TUCKER'S BLACKSTONE

The right of citizens to bear arms is just one more guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against tyranny, which though now appears remote in America, history has proven to be always possible. — Senator Hubert H. Humphrey

As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms. — Tench Coxe in `Remarks on the First Part of the Amendments to the Federal Constitution' under the Pseudonym "A Pennsylvanian" in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789 at 2 col. 1.

The writings of scholars who have written on the subject are virtually united on the point that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms, not simply the state national guards. — PROFESSOR GLENN HARLAN REYNOLDS

That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of The United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms... — Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, at 86-87

The people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possession of them. — Zachariah Johnson, 3 Elliot, Debates at 646

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them. — George Mason, during Virginia's Convention to Ratify the Constitution (1788)
Click to expand...
Social-ism is Government. It really is that simple.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Click to expand...

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
Click to expand...

Subject only to the police power, the right of the individual citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. (Illinois State Constitution)
Click to expand...
 
SmarterthanYou said:
when the government doesn't follow it's own rules, there is no law, just survival. you end up with 3 options. slavery, death, or freedom. you choose, hole digger
Click to expand...

Soooo you use that as an excuse to blow up a daycare center? Yes, we discussed all of this before the Insurrection.
 
Nordberg said:
They absolutely do. Who did they steal it from? If you had a clue, you would understand that equal branches are a big part of what made America exist this long. A strong judiciary is a counterbalance to the rampant greed and selfishness of congress and potentially the executive. 3 equal branches. You tell me how the power to interpret the constitution and the law is not vital to the country? Who should have that power..trump?
Click to expand...

Where does the constitution say the three govt branches are equal??? If the FF wanted that they'd have had the judges elected. The judiciary was meant to be the weak sister but it is now all -powerful. THINK
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top