trump: oblivious moron II

Corazón said:
246bb010d72aa2dc585b96dd11b52eef.jpg
Click to expand...

Never mind the ancient Daily Mail shit. Get that Ignore List up-to-date, swallow your biscuits, drink your milk, and go to bed. Or is school out now?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I know, I'm a snotty bitch right..... I try ... to camouflage it ... with girly ... giggles. Works ... on the other members ... of ... my herd. In ... my ... defense ... what do you ... expect from ... someone too ... simple-minded ... to handle ... basic punctuation ... ?
Click to expand...

Couldn't have said it better myself.
 
Only a trump could go from denying any kind of Russia collusion to saying there is nothing wrong with it. Only his flock of zombie groupies would unhinge their jaws and swallow it.

At that, while trump boasts today of an approval rating at "almost 40%," I saw that 26% of Republicans think trump has done something illegal or unethical. One in four Republicans refuse to be treated as suckers. I'm impressed.
 
RickyTavy said:
Only a trump could go from denying any kind of Russia collusion to saying there is nothing wrong with it. Only his flock of zombie groupies would unhinge their jaws and swallow it.

At that, while trump boasts today of an approval rating at "almost 40%," I saw that 26% of Republicans think trump has done something illegal or unethical. One in four Republicans refuse to be treated as suckers. I'm impressed.
Click to expand...

From "There were no meetings", to "There were meetings, but no collusion", to "Dems colluded with the Ukrainians", to "Well, if there was collusion, everyone would take that meeting", from the Trumpy claiming he learned of the meeting "just days ago" to "Yeah, it may have been mentioned back then" - you'd expect the Trumpletons to suffer from whiplash by now. Turns out, they don't. Their necks are as flexible as their spines.

I'd guess, if you asked the "one in four" whether (s)he'd withdraw support from the Trumpy, you can bet they won't, with an excuse such as, "Everyone does it." In case you think the Trumpy humiliates them, just consider how much more they're humiliating themselves.
 
Found an interesting bit posted by "archives" on a thread he or she started regarding "America First:"

"Trump administration to allow for 15,000 more foreign workers"

"The Department of Homeland Security will issue up to 15,000 visas allowing U.S. companies to hire temporary, non-agricultural workers, an announcement that comes as President Donald Trump has pushed a "Hire American" theme and at the start of the administration's “Made in America” week"

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...mission-240632
 
RickyTavy said:
Remind you of any other snotty bitch named Crawley?
Click to expand...

Crawley never put all that much effort into hiding his mendacity. PostFactProphet is too lazy even to live up to that subterranean standard.

Good summary:

What Did Trump Know About His Son’s Meeting, and When Did He Know It?

Donald Trump is not noted for his sense of humor — he is witless in every sense of the word — but he got off an unintentionally hilarious line the other day when he praised his son Donald Trump Jr. for being “open, transparent and innocent.” In truth, getting Trump Jr. to come clean about what happened in his infamous June 9, 2016, meeting with Russian representatives — also attended by Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner — has been as hard as getting his father to pay his contractors.

For a year, all of the Trumps have denied any Russian contacts — vociferously and duplicitously. On July 24, 2016, only weeks after his meeting with the Russians, Trump Jr. looked into an ABC TV camera and feigned outrage that anyone would even dare suggest such a thing. “These lies and the perpetuating of that kind of nonsense to gain some political capital is just outrageous,” he said. In keeping with this cover story, Jared Kushner failed to note any meetings with Russians on his initial SF-86 form to receive a security clearance; even when he filed an amended form in May, there was reportedly no mention of the June 9 meeting. (It’s a felony to file an intentionally misleading or incomplete SF-86.)

When the New York Times found out about the meeting and started asking questions, Trump Jr. issued on July 8 a mendacious statement, approved personally by the president, which admitted that, yes, the meeting had occurred but claimed that it was about Russia’s adoption policy and that he had no idea beforehand whom he would be seeing. When the Times found out that Trump Jr. was, in fact, “promised damaging information about Hillary Clinton before agreeing to meet with a Kremlin-connected Russian lawyer,” Trump Jr. grudgingly acknowledged that this was true but sought to minimize its significance by insisting that Natalia Veselnitskaya, the Russian lawyer, “had no meaningful information” to offer.

Only when the Times got its hands on the emails that preceded the meeting did Trump Jr. post them himself on July 11. Thus we found out that, when he was promised incriminating information on Hillary Clinton from the Russian government, Trump Jr.’s reaction was not to call the FBI but to take the meeting. “I love it,” he infamously wrote. That’s bad enough — it’s a felony for a campaign to accept or solicit anything of value from a foreign national or government — but we still haven’t gotten the full story of what happened.

After a week of further digging by multiple news organizations, we learned that the June 9 meeting included not only Veselnitskaya, a lawyer-lobbyist closely connected to the Kremlin, but also Rinat Akhmetshin, a former Russian counterintelligence officer who has lobbied alongside her to lift the Magnitsky Act imposing U.S. sanctions on Russia. According to the Times, “Mr. Akhmetshin has acquired a reputation for obtaining email records, information from spyware and other data that appeared to be drawn from Russian hackers.” (He has denied any wrongdoing.)

So the high command of the Trump campaign was meeting with a suspected Russian intelligence operative and hacker just six days before the Russians began releasing hacked Democratic National Committee emails. That’s another blockbuster revelation — and one that the supposedly transparent Trump Jr. did his utmost to hide.​
 
Owl'd You're Up! said:
Crawley never put all that much effort into hiding his mendacity. PostFactProphet is too lazy even to live up to that subterranean standard.

Good summary:
What Did Trump Know About His Son’s Meeting, and When Did He Know It?

Donald Trump is not noted for his sense of humor — he is witless in every sense of the word — but he got off an unintentionally hilarious line the other day when he praised his son Donald Trump Jr. for being “open, transparent and innocent.” In truth, getting Trump Jr. to come clean about what happened in his infamous June 9, 2016, meeting with Russian representatives — also attended by Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner — has been as hard as getting his father to pay his contractors.

For a year, all of the Trumps have denied any Russian contacts — vociferously and duplicitously. On July 24, 2016, only weeks after his meeting with the Russians, Trump Jr. looked into an ABC TV camera and feigned outrage that anyone would even dare suggest such a thing. “These lies and the perpetuating of that kind of nonsense to gain some political capital is just outrageous,” he said. In keeping with this cover story, Jared Kushner failed to note any meetings with Russians on his initial SF-86 form to receive a security clearance; even when he filed an amended form in May, there was reportedly no mention of the June 9 meeting. (It’s a felony to file an intentionally misleading or incomplete SF-86.)

When the New York Times found out about the meeting and started asking questions, Trump Jr. issued on July 8 a mendacious statement, approved personally by the president, which admitted that, yes, the meeting had occurred but claimed that it was about Russia’s adoption policy and that he had no idea beforehand whom he would be seeing. When the Times found out that Trump Jr. was, in fact, “promised damaging information about Hillary Clinton before agreeing to meet with a Kremlin-connected Russian lawyer,” Trump Jr. grudgingly acknowledged that this was true but sought to minimize its significance by insisting that Natalia Veselnitskaya, the Russian lawyer, “had no meaningful information” to offer.

Only when the Times got its hands on the emails that preceded the meeting did Trump Jr. post them himself on July 11. Thus we found out that, when he was promised incriminating information on Hillary Clinton from the Russian government, Trump Jr.’s reaction was not to call the FBI but to take the meeting. “I love it,” he infamously wrote. That’s bad enough — it’s a felony for a campaign to accept or solicit anything of value from a foreign national or government — but we still haven’t gotten the full story of what happened.

After a week of further digging by multiple news organizations, we learned that the June 9 meeting included not only Veselnitskaya, a lawyer-lobbyist closely connected to the Kremlin, but also Rinat Akhmetshin, a former Russian counterintelligence officer who has lobbied alongside her to lift the Magnitsky Act imposing U.S. sanctions on Russia. According to the Times, “Mr. Akhmetshin has acquired a reputation for obtaining email records, information from spyware and other data that appeared to be drawn from Russian hackers.” (He has denied any wrongdoing.)

So the high command of the Trump campaign was meeting with a suspected Russian intelligence operative and hacker just six days before the Russians began releasing hacked Democratic National Committee emails. That’s another blockbuster revelation — and one that the supposedly transparent Trump Jr. did his utmost to hide.​
Click to expand...

And, in a new development on this, it was revealed that the trump campaign paid big money to a high-priced criminal lawyer just two weeks before the Donnie emails were released and weeks before trump himself claims to have known anything about the meeting ... the meeting he didn't know about at the time his campaign was hiring junior a new mouthpiece.

There is good news there for those who contributed what little they could to help trump fleece them. His new campaign has reimbursed his company to the tune of $85,000 for use of his lawyers to defend him and his family for their sleaziness this year.
 
RickyTavy said:
And, in a new development on this, it was revealed that the trump campaign paid big money to a high-priced criminal lawyer just two weeks before the Donnie emails were released and weeks before trump himself claims to have known anything about the meeting ... the meeting he didn't know about at the time his campaign was hiring junior a new mouthpiece.

There is good news there for those who contributed what little they could to help trump fleece them. His new campaign has reimbursed his company to the tune of $85,000 for use of his lawyers to defend him and his family for their sleaziness this year.
Click to expand...

That's not really relevant, in that there wasn't anything untoward, they don't really fear anything, and wouldn't really need a lawyer. They just do it because, "Everybody does it." In these circles, you can't even show up at a party without your personal lawyer in tow.

Yup. I speculated the Trumpy runs for President to enrich himself starting about a year ago. Didn't really expect him to go after such small potatoes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top